Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 5;44(4):503-520.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769497. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise, Infrasound, and Health Symptoms at an Administrative Building and Men's Shelter: A Case Study

Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise, Infrasound, and Health Symptoms at an Administrative Building and Men's Shelter: A Case Study

Sophia K Chiu et al. Semin Hear. .

Abstract

Responses to complaints about low-frequency noise and infrasound at workplaces have not been extensively documented in the literature. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health evaluated low-frequency noise, infrasound, and health symptoms among employees of an organization providing services to homeless persons. The organization's campus was evacuated after two loud noise and vibration incidents related to methane flare on an adjacent landfill. Employees were interviewed about health symptoms, perceptions of noise, and how the incidents were handled. Available medical records were reviewed. Sound level and noise frequency measurements taken in vacated campus buildings not during these incidents revealed overall levels across frequencies up to 100 hertz were 64 to 73 dB, well below those associated with adverse health effects. However, an unbalanced frequency spectrum could have contributed to the unusual sounds or vibrations reported before the first incident. Some symptoms predating the incidents are consistent with low-frequency noise exposure but are also common and nonspecific. Most interviewed employees (57%) reported being uncomfortable returning to work on the campus. Multiple factors such as noise characteristics, health effects, and employee perceptions need to be considered when assessing health concerns related to low-frequency noise and infrasound.

Keywords: auditory symptoms; noise; octave band analysis; psychological contract; risk perception; vestibular symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the campus and methane flares. Not drawn to scale. Employees worked in the administrative building or the men's shelter. Circles with A–D refer to parking lot locations where we made noise measurements. The closed landfill extends from the top edge of the fenced area to beyond the top of the diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photograph of the methane flares at the time of the site visit. (Photo by NIOSH.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
One-third octave band noise levels measured approximately 2.5 to 3 m (8–10 ft) from an operating methane flare and blower.
Figure 4
Figure 4
One-third octave band noise levels across eight rooms in the administrative building when a methane flare was on versus when the flare was off. The square or circle shows the median. The vertical line shows the range of noise levels.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of median one-third octave band noise levels measured in the administrative building with a flare on versus off to European indoor guidelines for low-frequency noise and infrasound. Maximum noise levels by frequency are shown as horizontal black bars. Guidelines were not established for all frequencies measured. German guidelines ( A ) covered 8–100 Hz. Polish guidelines ( B ) covered 10–250 Hz. Dutch guidelines ( C ) covered 20–100 Hz. British guidelines ( D ) covered 10–160 Hz. The square or circle shows the median. The vertical line shows the range of noise levels.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Number of employees reporting various symptoms related to unusual sounds or vibrations at work.

References

    1. Nowacki G, Mitraszewska I, Kaminski T, Wierzejski A.Research of infrasound noise in heavy goods vehicle and busses. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. October 2008; 209–215. Accessed May 10, 2023 at:http://www.tsi.lv/sites/default/files/editor/science/Publikacii/ReStat_0...
    1. Broner N, Leventhall H G. Low frequency noise annoyance assessment by low frequency noise rating (LFNR) curves. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control. 1983;2(01):20–28.
    1. Scottish Environment Protection Agency Guidance on landfill gas flaring. November 2002. Accessed February 25, 2022 at:https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/28988/guidance-on-landfill-gas-flaring.pdf
    1. Araújo Alves J, Neto Paiva F, Torres Silva L, Remoaldo P. Low-frequency noise and its main effects on human health—a review of the literature between 2016 and 2019. Appl Sci (Basel) 2020;10(15):5205.
    1. Andresen J, Moller H. Equal annoyance contours for infrasonic frequencies. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control. 1984;3(03):1–9.

LinkOut - more resources