Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 25:14:1176794.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176794. eCollection 2023.

Enhancing the design of wine labels

Affiliations

Enhancing the design of wine labels

Anders Crichton-Fock et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The knowledge accrued through research in the domain of crossmodal correspondences has had a significant influence on a diverse array of disciplines, including behavioral studies, neuroscience, computational modeling, and notably, marketing, with the objective of aligning sensory experiences to help shape patterns of consumer behavior. A study is reported that explores the extension of these principles to the communication of products having a notably complex sensory profile, specifically within the context of wine. The central aim of the project is to explore the feasibility of using crossmodal communication as a strategic tool to augment the congruence between the consumers' multisensory expectations and their sensory experiences. For consumers venturing into the realm of wine selection without the advantage of prior tasting experience, it is of paramount importance to possess a robust understanding of the mandated information. This encompasses critical elements such as the wine's origin, grape varietal(s) used, geographical indications, producer qualifications, and the potential implications of these factors on the final wine product. This level of comprehension stands as a necessary prerequisite, enabling these consumers to make informed choices that align with their preferences, even in the absence of previous sensory encounters. Nonetheless, semiotic investigations underscore the significance attributed to symbolic components such as signs, logos, colors, gestures, and linguistic cues. Research from the field performing multisensory studies, presents a counterpoint to prevailing communication paradigms, advocating for a heightened incorporation of metaphors, analogies, symbols, metonymies, and allegories. This alternative approach aims to enhance the efficacy of communication strategies, offering a more profound and evocative means of conveying intricate messages on a more holistic level.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to a specific group of engaged wine consumers (n = 329). Besides questions regarding demographics, purchase behavior, and consumption behavior, the questionnaire included examples of multisensory communication through a selection of symbols, as well as alternative wine information.

Results: The results showed significant correlations between demographics, consumption behavior, and attitudes toward the tested multisensory symbols and alternative information, thus helping to gain a better understanding of the sensory properties that should be communicated on wine labels.

Discussion: The findings reported here highlight the effectiveness of visual crossmodal communication as a promising pathway capable of skillfully capturing consumer attributes, conveying multisensory experiences, and portraying the comprehensive timeline of taste evolution. As a result, it assumes a pivotal role as a communicative tool for intricate consumables, like wine, functioning at the crossroads of visual and sensory dimensions.

Keywords: complex foods; correspondence; crossmodal communication; multisensory; resource efficiency; vision; wine assessment; wine labels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Symbol in the questionnaire used to illustrate an alternative communication approach based on; (A) genetics and sensitivity; (B) dominant flavors in the wine; (C) the temporal dynamic change during the tasting experience – from when the wine hits the nose and mouth (attack), development on the palate (mid-palate), and the duration of flavors in the end (finish); (D) of non-existent qualities in the wine – such as the lack of complexity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An image that was included in the questionnaire, intended to illustrate an innovative method of label communication. This approach involves using relabeled wine bottles featuring solely sensory descriptors. The design of this concept was created by Elin Aronsen Beis.

References

    1. Alousque I. N. (2015). Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 173, 125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041 - DOI
    1. Bartoshuk L. M. (2000). Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chem. Senses 25, 447–460. doi: 10.1093/chemse/25.4.447, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartoshuk L. M., Duffy V. B., Lucchina L. A., Prutkin J., Fast K. (1998). PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 855, 793–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10660.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartoshuk L. M., Duffy V. B., Reed D., Williams A. (1996). Supertasting, earaches and head injury: genetics and pathology alter our taste worlds. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 20, 79–87. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00042-D, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartoshuk L. M., Rifkin B., Marks L. E., Hooper J. E. (1988). Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. Chem. Senses 13, 517–528. doi: 10.1093/chemse/13.4.517 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources