Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr;34(4):2512-2523.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10085-5. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Waiting times between examinations with intravascularly administered contrast media: a review of contrast media pharmacokinetics and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines

Affiliations
Review

Waiting times between examinations with intravascularly administered contrast media: a review of contrast media pharmacokinetics and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines

Aart J van der Molen et al. Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of contrast media (CM) will determine how long safe waiting intervals between successive CT or MRI examinations should be. The Contrast Media Safety Committee has reviewed the data on pharmacokinetics of contrast media to suggest safe waiting intervals between successive contrast-enhanced imaging studies in relation to the renal function of the patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Consider a waiting time between elective contrast-enhanced CT and (coronary) angiography with successive iodine-based contrast media administrations in patients with normal renal function (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) of optimally 12 h (near complete clearance of the previously administered iodine-based contrast media) and minimally 4 h (if clinical indication requires rapid follow-up). KEY POINTS: • Pharmacokinetics of contrast media will guide safe waiting times between successive administrations. • Safe waiting times increase with increasing renal insufficiency. • Iodine-based contrast media influence MRI signal intensities and gadolinium-based contrast agents influence CT attenuation.

Keywords: Contrast media; Hepatic insufficiency; Pharmacokinetics; Practice guideline; Renal insufficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:

Aart J. van der Molen : Guerbet

Ilona A. Dekkers : Guerbet

Remy W.F. Geenen : none

Marie-France Bellin : member ER Advisory Board

Michele Bertolotto : none

Torkel Brismar : none

Jean-Michel Correas : Bracco Imaging, Guerbet

Gertraud Heinz-Peer : none

Andreas H. Mahnken : none

Carlo C. Quattrocchi : Bracco Imaging, Guerbet, Bayer Healthcare, GE Healthcare

Alexander Radbruch : Bracco Imaging, Guerbet, Bayer Healthcare, GE Healthcare

Peter Reimer : none

Giles Roditi : none

Laura Romanini : none

Carmen Sebastià : none

Fulvio Stacul : none

Olivier Clement: Bracco Imaging, Guerbet, Bayer Healthcare

References

    1. Kwon C, Kang KM, Choi YH, et al. Renal safety of repeated intravascular administrations of iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast media within a short interval. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22:1547–1554. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourin M, Jolliet P, Ballereau F. An overview of the clinical pharmacokinetics of X-ray contrast media. Clin Pharmacokin. 1997;32:180–193. - PubMed
    1. Dean PB, Kivisaari L, Kormano M. Contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics of six ionic and nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol. 1983;18:368–374. - PubMed
    1. Bourrinet P, Dencausse A, Cochet P, Bromet-Petit M, Chambon C. Whole body quantitative autoradiographic study of the biodistribution of iobitridol in rats. Invest Radiol. 1994;29:1057–1060. - PubMed
    1. Coveney JR, Robbins MS. Biodistribution and excretion of 125I ioversol in conscious dogs. Invest Radiol. 1989;24(Suppl 1):S23–S27. - PubMed