Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e076672.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076672.

Impact of strategies to mitigate misinformation in diverse settings and populations: a protocol for a living evidence synthesis

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of strategies to mitigate misinformation in diverse settings and populations: a protocol for a living evidence synthesis

Michael Wilson et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Misinformation refers to inadvertent misleading information that the public may be exposed and share without intent to cause harm, and can delay or prevent effective care, affect mental health, lead to misallocation of health resources and/or create or exacerbate public-health crises. There are many strategies to address misinformation, but there is a need to evaluate their effects. Our objective is to synthesise and routinely update evidence to assess the impact of strategies to mitigate health-related misinformation in diverse settings, and populations.

Methods and analysis: We will search seven databases in May 2023 with planned updates at 6 and 9 months, which will be supplemented with searches for grey literature and reference lists of included studies and contacting experts. Two reviewers will independently screen all search results for studies that evaluate one or more approaches to addressing health-related misinformation. One researcher will conduct data extraction and risk of bias assessments, which will be reviewed by a second reviewer for accuracy. We will include experimental, quasi-experimental and observational studies for any populations, settings and diseases without language or publication restrictions. We will conduct quantitative analysis if meta-analytical pooling is possible. If pooling is not possible, we will synthesise quantitative data according to outcomes and interventions addressed, and present a narrative summary of findings disaggregated by sex and/or gender, irrespective of whether differences were found.

Ethics and dissemination: There are no individuals or protected health information involved and no safety issues identified. Results will be published through the Global Commission on Evidence and COVID-END websites, in a peer-reviewed journal, as well as through plain-language materials.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023421149.

Keywords: COVID-19; Decision Making; Health policy; Systematic Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Grimes K, Matlow A, Tholl B, et al. . Leaders supporting leaders: leaders’ role in building resilience and psychologically healthy workplaces during the pandemic and beyond. Healthc Manage Forum 2022;35:213–7. 10.1177/08404704221090126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janmohamed K, Walter N, Nyhan K, et al. . Interventions to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Health Commun 2021;26:846–57. 10.1080/10810730.2021.2021460 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges . The Evidence Commission report: A wake-up call and path forward for decision- makers, evidence intermediaries, and impact-oriented evidence producers. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster Health Forum, 2022.
    1. do Nascimento I, Pizarro A, Almeida J, et al. . Infodemics and health misinformation: A systematic review of reviews. 2022. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calo R, Coward C, Spiro ES, et al. . How do you solve a problem like misinformation Sci Adv 2021;7:eabn0481. 10.1126/sciadv.abn0481 - DOI - PMC - PubMed