Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):92.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9.

Co-creation of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making

Affiliations

Co-creation of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making

Tom Willgoss et al. Res Involv Engagem. .

Abstract

Background: Putting patients' needs and priorities at the forefront of healthcare initiatives and medical product development is critical to achieve outcomes that matter most to patients. This relies on the integration of early, meaningful patient engagement (PE) to learn what is important to patients, and collection of representative patient experience data (PXD). The increased number of PE/PXD efforts across global regulatory, health technology assessment, and healthcare systems is an important step forward to deliver improved health outcomes for patients. However, these initiatives are fragmented and lack integration, which is necessary to maximize efforts and reduce burden on patients. To overcome these challenges, the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator has been co-created by Patient Focused Medicines Development to provide practical resources that can facilitate and optimize PXD generation, collection, analysis, and dissemination for patient benefit and aims to be applicable across all therapeutic areas for all stakeholders.

Methods: Co-creation of the Navigator took place through an iterative process of validation and formalization driven by a diverse, multi-stakeholder working group with individuals who have varying knowledge/experience in PE/PXD.

Results: A series of workshops took place to conduct a gap analysis, develop a taxonomy model, and integrate existing frameworks. The collective insights led to the development of the Navigator consisting of four specific tools in the form of downloadable templates, which can be used to: (1) prioritize outcomes that matter most to patients and their caregivers; (2) select appropriate measurement methods for these outcomes; (3) identify when and why PXD is used throughout the product development cycle for each stakeholder; (4) identify when and why PXD is used throughout the healthcare process for each stakeholder. A public consultation was carried out to collect user feedback before the Navigator was made publicly available in December 2022.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator is the only publicly available toolkit developed with a multi-stakeholder and disease-agnostic approach providing taxonomically grouped resources to optimize the collection and collation of PXD for patient benefit. Future work will aim to further engage patients by adding a PE dimension to the Navigator.

Keywords: Healthcare; Medical, pharmaceutical, and technology development; Patient engagement; Patient experience data; Patient-centered care; Patient-generated data; Patient-preference studies; Patient-reported outcomes; Public and patient involvement.

Plain language summary

Engaging patients at the start of healthcare and medical product development projects can help better understand their experiences and what is most important to them. Ultimately this will achieve the best outcomes. However, if not carefully planned, projects that engage patients can lead to inefficiencies, such as patients being asked for the same information repeatedly. The collection of patient experience data—information related to patients’ experiences, needs, and priorities—also needs to be carefully managed. To help solve this problem, Patient Focused Medicines Development developed a publicly available “toolkit” called the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator. The Navigator has downloadable templates that can be filled in and used for projects in any disease area and by anyone collecting patient experience data. To represent different perspectives, individuals with a range of experiences and understanding of patient engagement projects worked together to co-create the toolkit. Several meetings took place to understand what the toolkit needed to do and to help provide a structure for the templates. There are four templates in the toolkit. These can be used to: (1) prioritize outcomes that matter most to patients and their caregivers; (2) select the best ways of measuring these outcomes; (3) identify when, why, and by whom patient experience data is used throughout the product development cycle; and (4) identify when, why and by whom patient experience data is used throughout the healthcare process. Future work will utilize public feedback to make the toolkit more user-friendly and provide education on how the Navigator can be used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EO is employed by Applied Patient Experience, LLC, which has contracts with a variety of non-profit organizations, pharmaceutical companies, and academic institutions. OAE is the Senior Vice President, Equity, Research and Programs at the National Health Council, a non-profit, membership organization that receives dues, sponsorships, and grants; a complete list of members, sponsors, and funders is available on the National Health Council website. However, both EO and OAE declare they have no conflicts of interest with this work and that none of the activities or sponsorship listed would have influenced the work reported. All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process for the development of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator. A schematic showing the co-creation and validation/formalization stages of the development process and the seven phases that comprised this, with a timeline to illustrate that the validation/formalization phases took place alongside the co-creation meetings. NHC National Health Council; PC-CIS patient-centered core impact sets; PE patient engagement; PFMD Patient Focused Medicines Development; PXD patient experience data
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic to describe the four tools that make up the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator. The four tools cover the whole lifecycle of PXD and each tool takes the format of a template that can be downloaded and filled in. PXD patient experience data
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of a survey completed by 73 respondents from a range of stakeholder groups. The survey was completed during the Patient Engagement Open Forum in April 2022. Attendees were invited to answer questions about the value of merging PE and PXD initiatives. PE patient engagement; PXD patient experience data
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Results of the public consultation survey. a Respondent demographics shown as a percentage of respondents in terms of stakeholder groups represented, expertise with patient engagement, and expertise with patient experience data (N = 35). b Bar graph showing the results of the questions asked around usability of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator. Respondents chose agree, neutral, or disagree in relation to the given statements (N = 18). c Bar graph showing respondents’ opinions regarding the relative usefulness of the Navigator for PXD initiatives (N = 20). d Bar graph showing respondents’ ranking of the relative value of ways to help make the Navigator a practical tool (N = 20). PXD patient experience data
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Results of the public consultation survey. a Respondent demographics shown as a percentage of respondents in terms of stakeholder groups represented, expertise with patient engagement, and expertise with patient experience data (N = 35). b Bar graph showing the results of the questions asked around usability of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator. Respondents chose agree, neutral, or disagree in relation to the given statements (N = 18). c Bar graph showing respondents’ opinions regarding the relative usefulness of the Navigator for PXD initiatives (N = 20). d Bar graph showing respondents’ ranking of the relative value of ways to help make the Navigator a practical tool (N = 20). PXD patient experience data

References

    1. Boutin M, Dewulf L, Hoos A, Geissler J, Todaro V, Schneider RF, et al. Culture and process change as a priority for patient engagement in medicines development. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51:29–38. doi: 10.1177/2168479016659104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schroeder K, Bertelsen N, Scott J, Deane K, Dormer L, Nair D, et al. Building from patient experiences to deliver patient-focused healthcare systems in collaboration with patients: a call to action. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022;56:848–858. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00432-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation. WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: Interim Report, 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/155002/WHO_HIS_SDS_2015.... Accessed 17 Jan 2023.
    1. Geissler J, Ryll B, di Priolo SL, Uhlenhopp M. Improving patient involvement in medicines research and development: a practical roadmap. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51:612–619. doi: 10.1177/2168479017706405. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perfetto EM, Burke L, Oehrlein EM, Epstein RS. Patient-focused drug development: a new direction for collaboration. Med Care. 2015;53:9–17. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000273. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources