Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 27:5:1197362.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1197362. eCollection 2023.

Female youth and mental health service providers' perspectives on the JoyPop™ app: a qualitative study

Ishaq Malik  1 , Arnaldo Perez  2 , Elaine Toombs  1 , Fred Schmidt  1   3 , Janine V Olthuis  4 , Jaidyn Charlton  1 , Elizabeth Grassia  1 , Crystal Squier  5 , Kristine Stasiuk  5 , Tina Bobinski  5 , Aislin R Mushquash  1
Affiliations

Female youth and mental health service providers' perspectives on the JoyPop™ app: a qualitative study

Ishaq Malik et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Mobile health (mHealth) apps are a promising adjunct to traditional mental health services, especially in underserviced areas. Developed to foster resilience in youth, the JoyPop™ app has a growing evidence base showing improvement in emotion regulation and mental health symptoms among youth. However, whether this novel technology will be accepted among those using or providing mental health services remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the JoyPop™ app's acceptance among (a) a clinical sample of youth and (b) mental health service providers.

Method: A qualitative descriptive approach involving one-on-one semi-structured interviews was conducted. Interviews were guided by the Technology Acceptance Model and were analyzed using a deductive-inductive content analysis approach.

Results: All youth (n = 6 females; Mage = 14.60, range 12-17) found the app easy to learn and use and expressed positive feelings towards using the app. Youth found the app useful because it facilitated accessibility to helpful coping skills (e.g., journaling to express their emotions; breathing exercises to increase calmness) and positive mental health outcomes (e.g., increased relaxation and reduced stress). All service providers (n = 7 females; Mage = 43.75, range 32-60) perceived the app to be useful and easy to use by youth within their services and expressed positive feelings about integrating the app into usual care. Service providers also highlighted various organizational factors affecting the app's acceptance. Youth and service providers raised some concerns about apps in general and provided recommendations to improve the JoyPop™ app.

Discussion: Results support youth and service providers' acceptance of the JoyPop™ app and lend support for it as an adjunctive resource to traditional mental health services for youth with emotion regulation difficulties.

Keywords: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); mental health; mobile health (mHealth) app; qualitative; resilience; service providers; the JoyPop app; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The JoyPop app.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual map summarizing youth acceptance of the JoyPop app using the technology acceptance model. The technology acceptance model includes the constructs of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitudes towards use. Organizing categories (left), generic categories (middle), and sub-categories (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Conceptual map summarizing service providers’ acceptance of the JoyPop app using an extended model of the technology acceptance model. The extended model of the technology acceptance model includes constructs of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes towards use, and facilitating conditions. Organizing categories (left), generic categories (middle), and sub-categories (right).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. MHASEF Research Team. The mental health of children and youth in Ontario: a baseline scorecard. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; (2015).
    1. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Changing directions, changing lives: the mental health strategy for Canada. Calgary, AB: MHCC; (2012).
    1. Children’s Mental Health Ontario. Kids can’t wait: 2020 report on wait lists and wait times for child and youth mental health care in Ontario (2020). Available at: https://cmho.org/wp-content/uploads/CMHO-Report-WaitTimes-2020.pdf (Accessed March 15, 2022).
    1. Brown SA, Parker JD, Godding PR. Administrative, clinical, and ethical issues surrounding the use of waiting lists in the delivery of mental health services. J Behav Health Serv Res. (2002) 29(2):217–28. 10.1007/BF02287708 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mental Health Commission of Canada. E-Mental Health in Canada: Transforming the Mental Health System Using Technology - a briefing document. Ottawa, ON: MHCC; (2014).

LinkOut - more resources