Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 20;6(19):10020-10029.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c01608. eCollection 2023 Oct 9.

Nature of Charge Carrier Recombination in CuWO4 Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Affiliations

Nature of Charge Carrier Recombination in CuWO4 Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Ivan Grigioni et al. ACS Appl Energy Mater. .

Abstract

CuWO4 is a ternary semiconductor oxide with excellent visible light harvesting properties up to 550 nm and stability at high pH values, which make it a suitable material to build photoanodes for solar light conversion to hydrogen via water splitting. In this work, we studied the photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance of transparent CuWO4 electrodes with tunable light absorption and thickness, aiming at identifying the intrinsic bottlenecks of photogenerated charge carriers in this semiconductor. We found that electrodes with optimal CuWO4 thickness exhibit visible light activity due to the absorption of long-wavelength photons and a balanced electron and hole extraction from the oxide. The PEC performance of CuWO4 is light-intensity-dependent, with charge recombination increasing with light intensity and most photogenerated charge carriers recombining in bulk sites, as demonstrated by PEC tests performed in the presence of sacrificial agents or cocatalysts. The best-performing 580 nm thick CuWO4 electrode delivers a photocurrent of 0.37 mA cm-2 at 1.23 VSHE, with a 7% absorbed photon to current efficiency over the CuWO4 absorption spectrum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) top views of (A) 2 layers and (B) 5 layers of CuWO4. Inset in (B): cross section of the CuWO4 film obtained by depositing 5 layers. (C) XRD patterns of the CuWO4 electrodes. The diffraction signals of WO3 (JCPDF 89–4476), CuWO4, and underlying FTO are identified with red bars, black arrows, and asterisks, respectively. (D) Absorption spectra of the CuWO4 photoanodes with increasing semiconductor thickness. Inset: scheme of the optical transitions in CuWO4. (E) Thickness of the electrodes with 1–6 CuWO4 layers, from cross-sectional FESEM images (left column) and calculated from the absorption coefficient at 420 nm (right column). (F) Extinction coefficient vs wavelength of a 5-layered CuWO4 electrode.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves recorded with CuWO4 multilayer photoanodes under (A) back-side or (B) front-side simulated solar light irradiation (100 mW cm–2) in 0.1 M KBi buffer solution at pH 9. The labels within the figures refer to the thickness of the CuWO4 layers, in nm. (C) Current density at 1.23 VSHE as a function of the CuWO4 thickness, under back- and front-side irradiation (empty and full symbols, respectively). (D) Overall photon flux in the AM 1.5 solar spectrum (black trace) and number of photons absorbed per second by CuWO4:580 (blue area). The dashed vertical line marks the CuWO4 absorption edge.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A, C) IPCE and (B, D) IQE analyses of CuWO4 multilayer photoanodes under (A, B) back-side and (C, D) front-side monochromatic irradiation, at 1.23 VSHE.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) LSV curves recorded with the CuWO4:580 photoelectrode under different irradiation intensities in contact with 0.1 M (0–1 sun) or 0.5 M (1.5–2 sun) (continuous lines) KBi solutions. The two dashed lines are the LSV curves recorded under 1.5 and 2 sun irradiation in contact with 0.1 M KBi solutions. (B) Photocurrent efficiency at 1.23 VSHE vs absorbed photons per unit time at different irradiation intensities.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Chopped chronoamperometry under 1 sun irradiation of an 80 nm thick CuWO4 photoanode (black line) and a 75 nm thick BiVO4 photoanode (red line), under back-side irradiation at 1.23 VSHE. The green (light on) and blue (light off) boxes display expanded portions of the photocurrent curve. (B) Chronoamperometric stability test of the CuWO4:580 electrode under simulated solar light irradiation in 0.1 M KBi. (C) Chopped chronoamperometry under 1 sun irradiation of the CuWO4:580 photoanode in the presence (red line) or in the absence (black line) of 0.5 M H2O2. (D) Chopped LSV curves recorded with a bare (black line) and NiFeOx-modified (red line) CuWO4:80 photoanode under monochromatic irradiation at 420 nm; the light intensity is 9 mW cm–2.

References

    1. Hisatomi T.; Kubota J.; Domen K. Recent Advances in Semiconductors for Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7520–7535. 10.1039/C3CS60378D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bard A. J.; Fox M. A. Artificial Photosynthesis: Solar Splitting of Water to Hydrogen and Oxygen. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 141–145. 10.1021/ar00051a007. - DOI
    1. Cowan A. J.; Barnett C. J.; Pendlebury S. R.; Barroso M.; Sivula K.; Grätzel M.; Durrant J. R.; Klug D. R. Activation Energies for the Rate-Limiting Step in Water Photooxidation by Nanostructured α-Fe2O3 Nd TiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10134–10140. 10.1021/ja200800t. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander B. D.; Kulesza P. J.; Rutkowska I.; Solarska R.; Augustynski J. Metal Oxide Photoanodes for Solar Hydrogen Production. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 2298–2303. 10.1039/b718644d. - DOI
    1. Tilley S. D.; Cornuz M.; Sivula K.; Grätzel M. Light-Inducedwater Splitting with Hematite: Improved Nanostructure and Iridium Oxide Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6405–6408. 10.1002/anie.201003110. - DOI - PubMed