Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 13;13(10):e071694.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694.

Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team

Affiliations

Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team

Daniel Baek et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a protocol to mitigate these challenges and rigorously evaluate a first-of-its-kind emergency department/hospital-based elder mistreatment intervention, the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT).

Methods and analysis: We used a multistep process to develop an evaluation protocol for VEPT: (1) creation of a logic model to describe programme activities and relevant short-term and long-term outcomes, (2) operationalisation of these outcome measures, (3) development of a combined outcome and (4) design of a protocol using telephone follow-up at multiple time points to obtain information about older adults served by VEPT. This protocol, which is informing an ongoing evaluation of VEPT, may help researchers and health system leaders design evaluations for similar elder mistreatment programmes.

Ethics and dissemination: This project has been reviewed and approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol #20-02021422. We aim to disseminate our results in peer-reviewed journals at national and international conferences and among interested patient groups and the public.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; GERIATRIC MEDICINE; Protocols & guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Challenges in designing and conducting evaluations of elder mistreatment (EM) programmes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
VEPT logic model. ED, emergency department; VEPT, Vulnerable Elder Protection Team. *complete, detailed list of Activities (assessments, interventions, referrals) included as Online Supplemental Material

References

    1. Sullivan CM. Evaluating domestic violence support service programs: waste of time, necessary evil, or opportunity for growth Aggression and Violent Behavior 2011;16:354–60. 10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.008 - DOI
    1. Hall JE, Karch DL, Crosby AE. Elder Abuse Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Core Data Elements For Use In Elder Abuse Surveillance. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016.
    1. Aging NIo . Elder abuse. health topics A-Z [Internet]. 2020. Available: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/elder-abuse#types
    1. Burnes D, Pillemer K, Lachs MSJTG. Elder abuse severity: A critical but Understudied dimension of Victimization for Clinicians and researchers. Gerontologist 2017;57:745–56. 10.1093/geront/gnv688 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis RC, Medina J, Avitabile N, et al. Reducing repeat incidents of elder abuse: results of a randomized experiment, final report; 2001.

Publication types