Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 26;12(19):6205.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12196205.

Dialysis Patients Respond Adequately to Influenza Vaccination Irrespective of Dialysis Modality and Chronic Inflammation

Affiliations

Dialysis Patients Respond Adequately to Influenza Vaccination Irrespective of Dialysis Modality and Chronic Inflammation

Christos Pleros et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Chronic inflammation and suboptimal immune responses to vaccinations are considered to be aspects of immune dysregulation in patients that are undergoing dialysis. The present study aimed to evaluate immune responses in hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) patients to a seasonal inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IQIV). (2) Methods: We enrolled 172 chronic dialysis patients (87 on HD and 85 on OL-HDF) and 18 control subjects without chronic kidney disease in a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Participants were vaccinated with a seasonal IQIV, and antibody titers using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay were determined before vaccination (month 0) and 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. Demographics and inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, IL-1β) were recorded at month 0. The primary endpoints were the rates of seroresponse (SR), defined as a four-fold increase in the HI titer, and seroprotection (SP), defined as HI titer ≥ 1/40 throughout the study period. Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 3.6.3) statistical software. The differences between groups were analyzed using chi-square and t-test analyses for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. To identify independent determinants of SR and SP, generalized linear models were built with response or protection per virus strain as the dependent variable and group, age, sex, time (month 0, 1, 3, 6), diabetes, IL-6, dialysis vintage, HD access, and HDF volume as independent explanatory variables. (3) Results: SR and SP rates were similar between control subjects, and dialysis patients were not affected by dialysis modality. SP rates were high (> 70%) at the beginning of the study and practically reached 100% after vaccination in all study groups. These results applied to all four virus strains that were included in the IQIV. IL-6 levels significantly differed between study groups, with HD patients displaying the highest values, but this did not affect SP rates. (4) Conclusions: Dialysis patients respond to influenza immunization adequately and similarly to the general population. Thus, annual vaccination policies should be encouraged in dialysis units. OL-HDF reduces chronic inflammation; however, this has no impact on SR rates.

Keywords: chronic inflammation; dialysis; hemodiafiltration; immune response; influenza vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Seroresponse rates among groups of participants. Abbreviations: HD, hemodialysis; HDF, hemodiafiltration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alluvial plot of seroprotection and seroresponse correlation among groups of participants. Abbreviations: NP, non-protected; P, protected; NR, non-responders; R, responders; HD, hemodialysis; HDF, hemodiafiltration; N, number of participants. The definitions of seroresponse and seroprotection can be seen in Section 2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plot of antibody titers evolution after vaccination (expressed as log10 values) ± SD throughout study period. Abbreviations: HD, hemodialysis; HDF, hemodiafiltration. Antibody titers were first log-transformed (with base 10) and then plotted by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the sample (denominator: n-1) at each time point (month 0, 1, 3, 6). (A) H1N1 antibody titers, (B) H3N2 antibody titers, (C) Yamagata antibody titers, (D) Victoria antibody titers.

References

    1. Piret J., Boivin G. Pandemics throughout History. Front. Microbiol. 2021;11:631736. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.631736. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plotkin S.A. Vaccines: Past, present and future. Nat. Med. 2005;11((Suppl. S4)):S5–S11. doi: 10.1038/nm1209. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plotkin S. History of vaccination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12283–12287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400472111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchy P., Buisson Y., Cintra O., Dwyer D.E., Nissen M., de Lejarazu R.O., Petersen E. COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from more than a century of pandemics and current vaccine development for pandemic control. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;112:300–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kilbourne E.D. Influenza Pandemics of the 20th Century. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006;12:9–14. doi: 10.3201/eid1201.051254. - DOI - PMC - PubMed