Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 30;15(19):4816.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15194816.

TP53 Mutation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Old Foe Revisited

Affiliations
Review

TP53 Mutation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Old Foe Revisited

Dong-Yeop Shin. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene in human cancers and was the first tumor suppressor gene to be discovered in the history of medical science. Mutations in the TP53 gene occur at various genetic locations and exhibit significant heterogeneity among patients. Mutations occurring primarily within the DNA-binding domain of TP53 result in the loss of the p53 protein's DNA-binding capability. However, a complex phenotypic landscape often combines gain-of-function, dominant negative, or altered specificity features. This complexity poses a significant challenge in developing an effective treatment strategy, which eradicates TP53-mutated cancer clones. This review summarizes the current understanding of TP53 mutations in AML and their implications. TP53 mutation in AML: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), six hotspot mutations (R175H, G245S, R248Q/W, R249S, R273H/S, and R282W) within the DNA-binding domain are common. TP53 mutations are frequently associated with a complex karyotype and subgroups of therapy-related or secondary AML. The presence of TP53 mutation is considered as a poor prognostic factor. TP53-mutated AML is even classified as a distinct subgroup of AML by itself, as TP53-mutated AML exhibits a significantly distinct landscape in terms of co-mutation and gene expression profiles compared with wildtype (WT)-TP53 AML.

Clinical implications: To better predict the prognosis in cancer patients with different TP53 mutations, several predictive scoring systems have been proposed based on screening experiments, to assess the aggressiveness of TP53-mutated cancer cells. Among those scoring systems, a relative fitness score (RFS) could be applied to AML patients with TP53 mutations in terms of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). The current standard treatment, which includes cytotoxic chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, is largely ineffective for patients with TP53-mutated AML. Consequently, most patients with TP53-mutated AML succumb to leukemia within several months, despite active anticancer treatment. Decitabine, a hypomethylating agent, is known to be relatively effective in patients with AML. Numerous trials are ongoing to investigate the effects of novel drugs combined with hypomethylating agents, TP53-targeting agents or immunologic agents.

Conclusions: Developing an effective treatment strategy for TP53-mutated AML through innovative and multidisciplinary research is an urgent task. Directly targeting mutated TP53 holds promise as an approach to combating TP53-mutated AML, and recent developments in immunologic agents for AML offer hope in this field.

Keywords: TP53 mutation; acute myeloid leukemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Human p53 protein structure (monomer). p53 consists of a transactivation motif (Residue 6–30, gray), transactivation domain (35–59, lime), DNA-binding domain (109–288), and tetramerization domain (319–355, blue). The DNA-binding site contains R248, which is most commonly mutated in AML. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/pdb/8F2I (accessed on 30 July 2023).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Function of p53. The wild-type p53 protein plays a diverse range of physiological roles, including involvement in DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, epigenomic regulation, control of stemness, lineage commitment, and differentiation. These functions are triggered in response to various cellular stresses, such as DNA damage, hypoxia, replicative stress, and oncogene expression.

References

    1. Finlay C.A., Hinds P.W., Levine A.J. The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation. Cell. 1989;57:1083–1093. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90045-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aubrey B.J., Strasser A., Kelly G.L. Tumor-Suppressor Functions of the TP53 Pathway. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016;6:a026062. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olivier M., Hollstein M., Hainaut P. TP53 Mutations in Human Cancers: Origins, Consequences, and Clinical Use. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010;2:a001008. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kandoth C., McLellan M.D., Vandin F., Ye K., Niu B., Lu C., Xie M., Zhang Q., McMichael J.F., Wyczalkowski M.A., et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature. 2013;502:333–339. doi: 10.1038/nature12634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Deiry W.S., Kern S.E., Pietenpol J.A., Kinzler K.W., Vogelstein B. Definition of a consensus binding site for p53. Nat. Genet. 1992;1:45–49. doi: 10.1038/ng0492-45. - DOI - PubMed