Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Observational Multicenter BRIDE Study
- PMID: 37835546
- PMCID: PMC10572070
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194852
Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Observational Multicenter BRIDE Study
Abstract
To evaluate the rate of early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) in Italy, criteria of patient selection and types of therapies delivered, an analysis of 1276 patients with stage I-II-III was conducted out of 1633 patients enrolled in the multicenter prospective observational BRIDE study. A total of 177 patients (13.9%) were treated with NAT and 1099 (85.9%) with surgery; in multivariate analysis, menopausal status, cT, cN, grade, HER2-positive and Triple negative (TN) subgroups were significantly associated with the decision to administer NAT. The type of NAT delivered was influenced by EBC subtype. NAT was administered to 53.2% of HER2+/HR-negative, 27.9% of HER2+/HR+, 7.1% of HER2-negative/HR+ and 30.3% of TN EBC patients. The pCR rates were similar to the ones reported in the literature: 74.2% in HER2+/HR-negative, 52.3% in HER2+/HR+, 17.2% in HER2-negative/HR+ and 37.9% in TN. In clinical practice, patient and tumor characteristics influenced oncologists in the decision to administer NAT in EBC and in the choice of the type of systemic therapy, according to ESMO and AIOM Guidelines. Currently, it is recommended always to evaluate the use of NAT in EBC, mainly in HER2+ and TN patients, considering that pCR is associated with significantly better survival of the patient and that effective therapies are now available for residual disease.
Keywords: criteria of choice of neoadjuvant therapy; early breast cancer; pathological response; types of neoadjuvant therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
A.F. advisory role for Roche, Astrazeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Exact Science, Pfizer, outside the submitted work; P.V. Advisory Board/speaker fee: Novartis, Lilly, Eisai, Ipsen, Pfizer, Institutional/Travel Grant: Roche, Novaris, Pfizer, Lilly, Eisai; A.T. Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Gilead, Seagen, MSD, Astrazeneca, Daiichi Sankyo.
Figures
References
-
- Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerejomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Glòobal Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
-
- Decessi per Tumore e Sesso in Italia Durante l’anno 2017—Dati ISTAT. [(accessed on 15 May 2023)]. Available online: http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCIS_CMORTE1_EV#.
-
- Fondazione AIOM- AIRTUM-PASSI I Numeri del Cancro in Italia 2020. [(accessed on 15 May 2023)]. Available online: www.fondazioneaiom.it.
-
- Vrijens F., Stordeur S., Beirens K., Devriese S., Van Eycken E., Vlayen J. Effect of hospital volume on processes of care and 5-year survival after breast cancer: A population-based study on 25,000 women. Breast. 2012;21:261–266. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous