Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 23;13(19):3004.
doi: 10.3390/ani13193004.

Irregular Findings on Teatcups in Milking Parlours in Sheep and Goat Farms and Potential Predictors

Affiliations

Irregular Findings on Teatcups in Milking Parlours in Sheep and Goat Farms and Potential Predictors

Charalambia K Michael et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were as follows: (a) to describe the prevalence of irregular findings on teatcups in milking parlours with dairy sheep and goats after the post-milking cleaning procedures had been completed, (b) to associate staphylococcal isolation from teatcups with the presence with irregular findings and (c) to identify predictors of the presence of irregular findings on teatcups. The teatcups in the milking parlour of 255 sheep and 66 goat farms were macroscopically evaluated for the presence of irregular findings immediately after the completion of cleaning of the parlour. In total, 1115 and 303 teatcups, respectively, were assessed. A detailed interview with the farmer served to record the characteristics of the milking parlour and obtain information about husbandry and health management variables in the farm. Teatcups with macroscopically evident irregular findings were observed in 150 milking parlours (46.7%). Overall, 593 teatcups (41.8%) were found with macroscopically evident irregular findings. Dirt, milk residues and cracks or tears were recorded in the teatcups of 90.0%, 36.0% and 12.7% of parlours with irregular findings. Staphylococci were more frequently isolated from teatcups with irregular findings than from undamaged ones: from 37.4% (222/593) versus 12.8% (106/825). They were more frequently isolated from teatcups with milk residues (39.4%) and teatcups with dirt (39.0%). Via multivariable analysis, the following three variables emerged as significant predictors of presence of teatcups with irregular findings: the daily number of milking sessions, month into the lactation period at sampling and number of available milking units per animal position. The study provides, for the first time internationally, an appraisal of the frequency of problematic teatcups in the milking parlours of small ruminant farms. The analysis of predictors has provided a focus for specific management aspects, where interventions need to be performed, in order to improve the situation in farms with problems. The consequent increased staphylococcal burden on teatcups with irregular findings points to the increased risk of intramammary infections in such cases.

Keywords: Staphylococcus; cleaning; goat; mastitis; milk; milking parlour; sheep; teatcup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Location of the small ruminant farms (right map: sheep flocks; left map: goat herds) around Greece, which were visited for the evaluation of teatcups in milking parlours and for the collection of samples and information.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of sheep and goat farms in milking parlours in which teatcups with dirt were observed, in accordance with the month into the lactation period at each farm at the time of the visit (dashed line indicates tendency line).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of sheep and goat farms in milking parlours in which teatcups with milk residues were observed, in accordance with the daily number of milking sessions performed in the farm.

References

    1. Bylund G. Dairy Processing Handbook. Publit Sweden; Stockholm, Sweden: 2015.
    1. Nageotte G.J. Cleaning and sanitizing milking equipment. Dairy Guidel. 1968;478:1–4.
    1. Vargova M., Vyrostkova J., Lakticova K.V., Zigo F. Effectiveness of sanitation regime in a milking parlour to control microbial contamination of teats and surfaces teat cups? Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2023;30:55–60. doi: 10.26444/aaem/161037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taponen S., Liski E., Heikkila A.M., Pyorala S. Factors associated with intramammary infection in dairy cows caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Corynebacterium bovis, or Escherichia coli. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100:493–500. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11465. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piepers S., Zrimsek P., Passchyn P., De Vliegher S. Manageable risk factors associated with bacterial and coliform counts in unpasteurized bulk milk in Flemish dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2014;97:3409–3419. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7203. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources