Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov:205:110952.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110952. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

Use of fasting plasma glucose to determine the approach for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Use of fasting plasma glucose to determine the approach for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus

Boyd E Metzger et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: Estimate the impact of OGTTs only on women with a screening FPG of 4.5-5.0 mmol/L using data from HAPO.

Methods: HAPO participants had 75-g OGTTs (24-32 weeks' gestation). At follow-up, children had adiposity assessed (overweight/obesity, obesity) and mothers and children had OGTTs. GDM was defined retrospectively using IADPSG criteria. Odds for neonatal (birthweight, percent neonatal fat, sum of skinfolds, cord C-peptide > 90th percentiles) and follow-up outcomes were assessed in those with HAPO FPG ≤ 4.4 or > 4.4 mmol/L and GDM or no GDM focusing on women with FPG > 4.4 and no GDM (Group 3) vs women with GDM and FPG ≤ 4.4 (Group 2).

Results: This strategy would miss a diagnosis of GDM in 14.7%. Odds for neonatal outcomes in Groups 2 and 3 were not different (ORs: 1.14 to 1.29). Odds at follow-up for type 2 diabetes and disorders of glucose metabolism in mothers were higher in Group 2 (ORs: 3.51, 2.57). Odds for childhood impaired glucose tolerance or adiposity outcomes were not different for Groups 2 and 3.

Conclusions: HAPO mothers whose GDM diagnosis would be missed were not at greater risk for adverse neonatal and childhood outcomes than mothers with FPG of 4.5-5.0 without GDM.

Keywords: Fasting plasma glucose; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Perinatal outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy (Metzger, BE, corresponding author). Diabetes Care 2010; 33(3):676–682. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. NEJM 2008; 358:1991–2002. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Shah ESM. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Simplifying the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy diagnostic algorithm using fasting plasma glucose. Diabetes Care 2010; 33(9):2018–2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trujillo J, Vigo A, Reichelt A, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI. Fasting plasma glucose to avoid a full OGTT in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Res and Clin Practice 2014; 105:322–326. - PubMed
    1. Zhu W, Fan L, Yang H, Kong L, Su S, et al. Fasting plasma glucose at 24–28 weeks to screen for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:2038–2040. - PMC - PubMed