Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 4:7:100439.
doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100439. eCollection 2023.

The use of mantrailing dogs in police and judicial context, future directions, limits and possibilities - A law review

Leif Woidtke  1 , Frank Crispino  2 , Barbara Ferry  3 , Udo Gansloßer  4 , Nina Marie Hohlfeld  5 , Tom Osterkamp  6
Affiliations
Review

The use of mantrailing dogs in police and judicial context, future directions, limits and possibilities - A law review

Leif Woidtke et al. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. .

Abstract

The extraordinary capabilities of the canine nose are increasingly being used by law enforcement agencies in many countries to solve and reconstruct crimes. As a result, this type of forensic evidence can be and is still being challenged in the courts. So far, only a few publications have addressed the jurisprudence concerning mantrailing. We provide an overview of the jurisprudence in Germany and the USA, as well as insights from France. Relevant databases were searched, and 201 verdicts from Germany and 801 verdicts from the USA were analyzed. As a result, 16 published verdicts on the topic of mantrailing were found for Germany, and 44 verdicts since 2010 were found for the USA. The use of mantrailers and human scent discrimination dogs is employed in the investigative process in all three countries. The results derived from these methods are admissible as evidence in court, albeit not as sole evidence.

Keywords: Forensic science; Human scent evidence; Law; Mantrailing; Mantrailing as evidence in court.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Neuhaus W. Über die Riechschärfe des Hundes für Fettsäuren. Z. Vgl. Politikwiss. 1953;35:527–552.
    1. Neuhaus W. Die Unterscheidungsfähigkeit des Hundes für Duftgemische. Z. Vgl. Politikwiss. 1956;39:25–43.
    1. Renwrantz L. Freilandversuche mit Hunden zur Bestimmung der Riechschwelle für Buttersäure. Z. Säugetierkunde. 1972;38:38–63.
    1. Passe D.H., Walker J.C. Odor psychophysics in vertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1985;9:431–467. - PubMed
    1. Riezzo I., Neri M., Rendine M., Bellifemina A., Cantatore S., Fiore C., Turillazzi E. Cadaver dogs: unscientific myth or reliable biological devices? Forensic Sci. Int. 2014;244:213–221. - PubMed