Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan:76:68-78.
doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Name order effects in measuring adolescent social networks using rosters

Affiliations

Name order effects in measuring adolescent social networks using rosters

Shuyin Liu et al. Soc Networks. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Recent studies have found order effects in social network data collection, where later names on a roster receive fewer nominations. Some thus argue for randomizing name orders or sampling peer names for survey rosters. We model order effects as biases in nomination choices and demonstrate observational and experimental methods for assessing these biases and illuminating their mechanisms. Employing these lenses, we find little evidence of order effects on eight sociometric questions in four middle school cohorts over six waves. To inform future work, we investigate aspects of the survey situation that may amplify or attenuate order effects. Analyzing these moderating forces offers guidance for detecting, understanding, and mitigating order effects in future research.

Keywords: Adolescent Friendships; Data Collection; Measurement Error; Name Rosters; Peer Nomination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Results of Linear Indegree Models. Unstandardized regression coefficients are presented in the figure. Significant coefficients (p<0.05; two-tailed) are indicated with boldface text. Refer to Table S1 in the Appendix for additional details.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Results of Logistic Nomination Models. Note: Coefficients are in log odds. Significant coefficients (p<0.05; two-tailed) are indicated with boldface text. Refer to Table S2 in the Appendix for additional details.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Logistic Nomination Models of Row and Column Effects. Refer to Table S3 in the Appendix for coefficients and p-values.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Name Order Effects in All Schools in Wave 1–2. The triangles represent statistically significant coefficients (p <0.05) and the circles represent non-significant coefficients. The full set of coefficients and p-values is given in Table S2 in the Appendix.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Distribution of Name Order Effects across Waves. Triangles represent statistically significant coefficients (p <0.05) and the circles represent non-significant coefficients. The full set of coefficients and p-values is given in Table S2 in the Appendix.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
(1.5-column fitting image) Results of the Rehearsing Roster Experiment in Wave 1. Refer to Table S4 in the Appendix for coefficients and p-values.

References

    1. adams jimi, Santos T, and Williams VN 2021. Strategies for collecting social network data. In Light R and Moody J (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Networks (pp. 117–136). 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190251765.013.10 - DOI
    1. Brewer DD 2000. Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Social Networks 22(1), 29–43.
    1. Cillessen AHN, and Marks PEL 2017. Methodological choices in peer nomination research. In Marks Peter E. L. & Cillessen Antonius H. N. (Eds.), New Directions in Peer Nomination Methodology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 157, 21–44. - PubMed
    1. Fredrickson MM, and Chen Y 2019. Permutation and randomization tests for network analysis. Social Networks, 59, 171–183.
    1. Goodreau S, Kitts JA, and Morris M 2009. Birds of a feather or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent friendship networks. Demography 46(1): 103–125. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources