Name order effects in measuring adolescent social networks using rosters
- PMID: 37840904
- PMCID: PMC10569157
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2023.07.002
Name order effects in measuring adolescent social networks using rosters
Abstract
Recent studies have found order effects in social network data collection, where later names on a roster receive fewer nominations. Some thus argue for randomizing name orders or sampling peer names for survey rosters. We model order effects as biases in nomination choices and demonstrate observational and experimental methods for assessing these biases and illuminating their mechanisms. Employing these lenses, we find little evidence of order effects on eight sociometric questions in four middle school cohorts over six waves. To inform future work, we investigate aspects of the survey situation that may amplify or attenuate order effects. Analyzing these moderating forces offers guidance for detecting, understanding, and mitigating order effects in future research.
Keywords: Adolescent Friendships; Data Collection; Measurement Error; Name Rosters; Peer Nomination.
Figures






References
-
- adams jimi, Santos T, and Williams VN 2021. Strategies for collecting social network data. In Light R and Moody J (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Networks (pp. 117–136). 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190251765.013.10 - DOI
-
- Brewer DD 2000. Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Social Networks 22(1), 29–43.
-
- Cillessen AHN, and Marks PEL 2017. Methodological choices in peer nomination research. In Marks Peter E. L. & Cillessen Antonius H. N. (Eds.), New Directions in Peer Nomination Methodology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 157, 21–44. - PubMed
-
- Fredrickson MM, and Chen Y 2019. Permutation and randomization tests for network analysis. Social Networks, 59, 171–183.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources