Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):2020-2032.
doi: 10.1109/taffc.2022.3143803. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

Artificial Emotional Intelligence in Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Artificial Emotional Intelligence in Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults: A Pilot Study

Hojjat Abdollahi et al. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2023 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

This paper presents our recent research on integrating artificial emotional intelligence in a social robot (Ryan) and studies the robot's effectiveness in engaging older adults. Ryan is a socially assistive robot designed to provide companionship for older adults with depression and dementia through conversation. We used two versions of Ryan for our study, empathic and non-empathic. The empathic Ryan utilizes a multimodal emotion recognition algorithm and a multimodal emotion expression system. Using different input modalities for emotion, i.e. facial expression and speech sentiment, the empathic Ryan detects users emotional state and utilizes an affective dialogue manager to generate a response. On the other hand, the non-empathic Ryan lacks facial expression and uses scripted dialogues that do not factor in the users emotional state. We studied these two versions of Ryan with 10 older adults living in a senior care facility. The statistically significant improvement in the users' reported face-scale mood measurement indicates an overall positive effect from the interaction with both the empathic and non-empathic versions of Ryan. However, the number of spoken words measurement and the exit survey analysis suggest that the users perceive the empathic Ryan as more engaging and likable.

Keywords: Artificial Emotional Intelligence; Dementia and Depression; Emotion Recognition; Social Robotics; empathic robots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Using a multimodal emotion perception system to interpret the input modalities and output appropriate responses in a multimodal emotion expression system (SA: Sentiment Analysis, FER: Facial Expression Recognition).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Ryan’s animated face is capable of showing facial expressions.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The ResNet structure used for FER. The first few layers extracts the facial features and the Fully Connected Layers and the Softmax layer, classify the emotion. Layers in order from left to right: Input Image (64 × 64 × 3); Conv2D (64 × 64 × 16); 9 Residual Blocks (64 × 64 × 16); 1 Residual Block (32 × 32 × 32); 8 Residual Blocks (32 × 32 × 32); 1 Residual Block (16 × 16 × 64); 8 Residual Blocks (16 × 16 × 64); Fully Connected (3 outputs); Softmax (3 outputs).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The loss of the initial training phase (left) and fine tuning the network on images of people 50+ years old (right).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
The emotion tracking system is more robust to sudden changes and noises in the input. The horizontal axis is time and the vertical axis is the emotional state with a range between −1 (Negative) and +1 (Positive).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Sample written dialogue between Ryan (blue) and a user (green). The sentiment of the user’s response is used to choose an empathic reply.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
The architecture of the Ryan software. The module on the right is responsible for the dialogue. The modules on the left are responsible for sensing and expressing emotions.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Users interacting with Ryan.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Changes (improvement) in participants’ face-scale score after conversation with Ryan.

References

    1. Feil-Seifer D and Mataric MJ, “Defining socially assistive robotics,” in Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on. IEEE, 2005, pp. 465–468.
    1. Banerjee D, Rai M et al., “Social isolation in covid-19: The impact of loneliness,” International Journal of Social Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 525–527, 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aung K, Nurumal MS, and Bukhari W, “Loneliness among elderly in nursing homes,” International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly And Disabled, vol. 2, pp. 72–8, 2017.
    1. Unbehaun D, Aal K, Carros F, Wieching R, and Wulf V, “Creative and cognitive activities in social assistive robots and older adults: Results from an exploratory field study with pepper,” in Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Demos and Posters. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET), 2019.
    1. Ghafurian M, Ellard C, and Dautenhahn K, “Social companion robots to reduce isolation: a perception change due to covid-19,” in IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 2021, pp. 43–63.

LinkOut - more resources