Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):63.
doi: 10.5334/joc.308. eCollection 2023.

Consensus Paper: Situated and Embodied Language Acquisition

Affiliations

Consensus Paper: Situated and Embodied Language Acquisition

Lorraine D Reggin et al. J Cogn. .

Abstract

Theories of embodied cognition postulate that perceptual, sensorimotor, and affective properties of concepts support language learning and processing. In this paper, we argue that language acquisition, as well as processing, is situated in addition to being embodied. In particular, first, it is the situated nature of initial language development that affords for the developing system to become embodied. Second, the situated nature of language use changes across development and adulthood. We provide evidence from empirical studies for embodied effects of perception, action, and valence as they apply to both embodied cognition and situated cognition across developmental stages. Although the evidence is limited, we urge researchers to consider differentiating embodied cognition within situated context, in order to better understand how these separate mechanisms interact for learning to occur. This delineation also provides further clarity to the study of classroom-based applications and the role of embodied and situated cognition in the study of developmental disorders. We argue that theories of language acquisition need to address for the complex situated context of real-world learning by completing a "circular notion": observing experimental paradigms in real-world settings and taking these observations to later refine lab-based experiments.

Keywords: embodiment; language acquisition; language learning; situated context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

References

    1. Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., & Brandon, B. (2015). How parents introduce new words to young children: The influence of development and developmental disorders. Infant Behavior & Development, 39, 148–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.02.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albaret, J.-M., & de Castelnau, P. (2009). Place des troubles de la motricité dans les troubles spécifiques du langage oral. Développements, 1, 5–13. DOI: 10.3917/devel.001.0005 - DOI
    1. Anderson, N. J., Graham, S. A., Prime, H., Jenkins, J. M., & Madigan, S. (2021). Linking quality and quantity of parental linguistic input to child language skills: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 92(2), 484–501. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13508 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116(3), 463–498. DOI: 10.1037/a0016261 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(8), 617–629. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1476 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources