Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 11;23(4):2.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.6759. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.

Innovative Health and Social Integrated Care Model Effectiveness to Improve Quality Care for Chronic Patients: A Single Group Assignment Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Innovative Health and Social Integrated Care Model Effectiveness to Improve Quality Care for Chronic Patients: A Single Group Assignment Clinical Trial

Ester Gavaldà-Espelta et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic disease have become one of the major challenges for health and social protection systems in developed countries. Integrated care models (ICM) have demonstrably improved the quality of care of chronic patients. However, new models of integration need further evaluation of its effectiveness and outcomes.

Methods: The ICM studied promoted coordination between the health and social sectors during a 6-month period, through an ad hoc developed application (app) that enabled a constant flow of communication between professionals from both sectors. Patients' quality of life, treatment adherence, chronic patient experience and caregiver overload were assessed by questionnaires at baseline, at the end of the intervention and 6 months post-intervention.

Results: The implementation of the new health and social ICM permitted new case detection and medical and social services offered to chronic patients. Furthermore, the quality of life and treatment adherence of patients and caregiver overload were significantly improved. These positive effects lasted at least 6 months after the intervention.

Conclusions: Integrated care may facilitate access to care services, increase perceived patient quality of life and treatment adherence. Enhanced access to medical and social services from complex chronic patients may have important implications for caregivers and the care systems who are struggling to adapt to an expanding demand.

Antecedents: Els pacients amb malalties cròniques representen un dels grans reptes per als sistemes de salut i protecció social als països desenvolupats. S’ha demostrat que l’atenció integrada millora la qualitat assistencial dels pacients crònics. Tanmateix, els resultats i l’efectivitat de nous models d’integració requereixen ser avaluats.

Metodologia: El model d’atenció integrada d’estudi va promoure la coordinació entre els sectors sanitari i social durant un període de 6 mesos mitjançant una aplicació (app) desenvolupada ad hoc que permetia un flux constant de comunicació entre professionals d’ambdós sectors. La qualitat de vida dels pacients, l’adherència al tractament, l’experiència del pacient i la sobrecàrrega del cuidador es van avaluar mitjançant qüestionaris a l’inici, al final de la intervenció i 6 mesos després de la intervenció.

Resultats: La implantació de l’atenció integrada social i sanitària va permetre la detecció de nous casos i un major accés dels pacients crònics als serveis mèdics i socials. A més, va millorar significativament la qualitat de vida i l’adherència al tractament dels pacients i la sobrecàrrega dels cuidadors. Aquests efectes positius van perdurar almenys 6 mesos després de la intervenció.

Conclusions: L’atenció integrada pot facilitar l’accés als serveis assistencials, augmentar la qualitat de vida percebuda dels pacients i l’adherència al tractament. L’accés millorat als serveis mèdics i socials dels pacients crònics complexos pot tenir implicacions importants per als cuidadors i els sistemes assistencials que lluiten per adaptar-se a una demanda creixent.

Keywords: chronic disease; implementation science; information and communication technology (ICT); integrated healthcare systems; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Study design flowchart and schemes of the intervention design and the Salut+Social integrated care model.
Figure 1
Salut+Social integrated care model implementation and intervention plan. A. Study design flowchart. B. Integrated care model (left) and Intervention (right) schemes.
EQ-5D-3L global puntuations before and after the intervention and frequency of severity by dimension.
Figure 2
Effect of the Salut+Social intervention on patients’ perceived health-related quality of life. A. EQ-5D-3L global punctuation (mean ± SD) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after the initiation of the intervention. B. EQ-5D-3L global punctuation (mean) by health condition at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after the start of the intervention. C-G. Proportion of patients (n) at each severity level in the dimensions of pain and malaise (C), anxiety and depression (D), mobility (E), self-care (F) and usual activities (G) of the EQ-5D-3L at different times. Statistical analysis was by Student’s t test in (A) and McNemar’s test in (C-G). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Sample’s treatment adherence and IEXPAC questionnaire puntuation before and after the intervention.
Figure 3
Effect of the Salut+Social intervention on patients’ treatment adherence and chronic patient experience. A. Percentage of patients (%) showing appropriate treatment adherence according to the Morsiky-Green dichotomous questionnaire. B. Mean score (SD) obtained for each question of the IEXPAC questionnaire 6 and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention. Statistical analysis was by McNemar test in (A) and Wilcoxon test in (B).
Social dependence grant and other social services assignment before and after the intervention.
Figure 4
Effect of the Salut+Social intervention on patients’ engagement with social services. A. Proportion of patients (n) with different grades of social dependency assignment. B. Proportion of patients (n) with home assistance or daycare center assignment. Statistical analysis involved the McNemar test in (A) and (B). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Caregiver overload score and hours of caring time before and after the intervention.
Figure 5
Effect of the Salut+Social intervention on caregiver overload. A. Mean (SD) caregiver burden score according to Zarit test at baseline and 6 and 12 months post-intervention. B. Mean (SD) hours/week of informal and remunerated caregivers’ time spent in caring. Statistical analysis was by McNemar test in (A); *p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ezeh AC, Bongaarts J, Mberu B. Global population trends and policy options. The Lancet. 2012. Jul 14; 380(9837): 142–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60696-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Divo MJ, Martinez CH, Mannino DM. Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity. Eur Respir J. 2014. Oct 1; 44(4): 1055–68. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00059814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borgermans L, Marchal Y, Busetto L, Kalseth J, Kasteng F, Suija K, et al. How to improve integrated care for people with chronic conditions: Key findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and beyond. Int J Integr Care. 2017. Jul 1; 17(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3096 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tinetti ME, Fried TR, Boyd CM. Designing health care for the most common chronic condition – Multimorbidity. JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012; 307: 2493–4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5265 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hornby-Turner YC, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Health assets in older age: A systematic review. Vol. 7, BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group; 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013226 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources