Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 25;12(9):1290-1304.
doi: 10.21037/gs-22-710. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

The challenging patient in autologous breast reconstruction: obesity, breast ptosis and beyond

Affiliations
Review

The challenging patient in autologous breast reconstruction: obesity, breast ptosis and beyond

Edward H Nahabet et al. Gland Surg. .

Abstract

Autologous breast reconstruction has consistently demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction, ideal aesthetic results, and a low risk of complications. With the increasing incidence of breast cancer diagnoses and higher reconstruction rates, surgeons encounter a broader spectrum of patients. Obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction are more likely to experience a surgical complication. While free tissue transfer carries a higher donor site complication rate, implant-based reconstruction carries a higher loss of reconstruction in this population. Additionally, autologous reconstruction consistently demonstrates better patient-reported outcomes. Oncoplastic reconstruction is an oncologically safe alternative to free tissue transfer and implant reconstruction which reduces the risk of complications and the risk of delaying adjuvant therapy. Particularly in obese patients for whom radiation is indicated based on tumor size or nodal involvement, oncoplastic reconstruction is maximally beneficial. The Goldilocks mastectomy is yet another alternative to free tissue transfer or implant reconstruction which carries an acceptable risk profile, especially when augmentation with tissue expander or implant is delayed and performed at a second stage. In patients with breast ptosis undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy, vertical skin reduction allows an acceptable aesthetic result while minimizing the risk for mastectomy flap necrosis (MFN), especially in comparison to Wise pattern skin reduction. If a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is to be performed in the setting of breast ptosis, a nipple delay or a pre-mastectomy reduction/mastopexy is the safest and most conservative approach, but can alter the timeline for primary cancer resection and therefore is predominantly performed in patients with a genetic predisposition or those undergoing a prophylactic mastectomy. Patients with obesity, breast ptosis, advanced age, active smoking history, prior radiation therapy, or abdominal procedures can carry an increased risk of complications and present a challenge to plastic surgeons. We review the most recent literature published regarding reconstruction in these patient groups and seek to provide practical information to help inform clinical decision-making and operative execution.

Keywords: Autologous breast reconstruction; obesity; ptosis; surgical technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-22-710/coif). The series “Advances in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2020 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available online: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-su...
    1. Rosenberg PS, Barker KA, Anderson WF. Estrogen Receptor Status and the Future Burden of Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancers in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107:djv159 .10.1093/jnci/djv159 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:46-54. 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M. Systematic review of studies of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 2007;16:547-67. 10.1016/j.breast.2007.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011-2012. NCHS Data Brief 2013;(131):1-8. - PubMed