Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 28:14:1251357.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1251357. eCollection 2023.

Re-visiting the six-item Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6) and its psychometric properties

Frank Bezzina  1 , Agnieszka Zielińska  2 , Vincent Cassar  1
Affiliations

Re-visiting the six-item Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6) and its psychometric properties

Frank Bezzina et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Presenteeism has often been considered as the correlate of absenteeism and associated to productivity loss. This study sought to re-examine the psychometric properties of the 6-item Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6), a popular measure which has been translated in a number of languages. The study adopted a cross-sectional design with 268 participants aged 18 - 65 working in a multinational IT company with headquarters based in Poland. The respondents participated willingly in an online questionnaire on a presenteeism health-related productivity measure (SPS-6), job resources (peer support), job demands (work-to-family conflict), engagement and burnout. Their responses were subjected to statistical analyses. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed that the SPS-6 is better represented by two singular and independent components, namely completing work and avoiding distractions, rather than an aggregated measure of health-related productivity. In fact, the aggregated measure had convergent and discriminant validity issues. We also assessed, via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the explanatory role of the SPS-6 within the wider well-being discourse by subjecting its' factors as outcomes using the JD-R framework. Here, burnout was better at explaining its relationship to avoiding distractions and completing work compared to engagement, while avoiding distractions was more dominant than completing work in explaining indirect pathways. Given the convergent and discriminant validity of its two-dimensional measures, we argue that the SPS-6 is a better assessment of health-related productivity in the light of presenteeism when keeping both components separate rather than adding the scores from both dimensions to provide a global score as has been the practice so far. In addition, the SEM findings suggest that both SPS-6 components may require different theoretical explanations. This study supports a growing chorus of scholars who argue the need to look deeper into the presenteeism phenomenon, not least its measures.

Keywords: JD-R model; Stanford presenteeism scale; health-related productivity; occupational well-being; presenteeism; psychometric properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual model (JD-R) with SPS-6 factors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CFA model with standardized loadings (Model 1F).
Figure 3
Figure 3
CFA model with standardized loadings (Model 2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Direct effects path diagram with standardized loadings for significant paths (Model 3). *p ≤ 0.10, **p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.01.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ab Hamit M. R., Sami W., Sidek M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 890, 012163–012165. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163 - DOI
    1. Abdi F., Jahangiri M., Kamalinia M., Cousins R., Mokarami H. (2021). Presenteeism and work ability: development of the Persian version of the Stanford Presenteeism scale (P-SPS-6) and measurement of its psychometric properties. BMC Psychol 9:120. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00617-3, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aronsson G., Gustafsson K. (2005). Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 47, 958–966. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aronsson G., Gustafsson K., Dallner M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54, 502–509. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.7.502, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakker A. B., Demerouti E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 22, 309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources