Updated review on the use of neuromuscular blockade during intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in the modern anesthesia era
- PMID: 37843561
- DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03265-6
Updated review on the use of neuromuscular blockade during intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in the modern anesthesia era
Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) monitoring is a common practice in neurosurgery to prevent postoperative neurological damage. However, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) during Tc-MEP monitoring is a subject of controversy. In addition, the effectiveness of sugammadex, a selective reversal agent, in the context of Tc-MEP monitoring requires further investigation. This review aimed to clarify the considerations involved in achieving optimal Tc-MEP monitoring while ensuring patient safety. Preoperative patient selection, comorbidity assessment, motor power evaluation, and the nature of the planned surgery are critical factors. Accurate paralysis assessment, continuous NMBA infusion, and post-tetanic stimulation techniques are essential for achieving optimal partial NMB. The decision to administer an NMB during Tc-MEP monitoring necessitates a careful evaluation of the balance between accuracy and potential complications. This review emphasizes the challenges associated with NMB administration during Tc-MEP monitoring and highlights the need for personalized patient assessment.
Keywords: Brain surgery; Neuromuscular blockade; Spine surgery; Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of post-tetanic motor evoked potential as an augmentation technique under partial neuromuscular blockade during craniotomy.Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Feb;170:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Dec 3. Clin Neurophysiol. 2025. PMID: 39647178
-
Comparison of motor-evoked potentials monitoring in response to transcranial electrical stimulation in subjects undergoing neurosurgery with partial vs no neuromuscular block.Br J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;110(4):567-76. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes395. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Br J Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23378247 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of reliability of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under general anesthesia.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):E994-E1000. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318188adfc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. PMID: 19092611
-
Impact of anesthesia on transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: a review of the literature.Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Oct;27(4):E7. doi: 10.3171/2009.8.FOCUS09145. Neurosurg Focus. 2009. PMID: 19795956 Review.
-
A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.J Anesth. 2020 Feb;34(1):5-28. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02698-2. Epub 2019 Oct 19. J Anesth. 2020. PMID: 31630259 Review.
References
-
- Taniguchi M, Schram J, Cedzich C. Recording of myogenic motor evoked potential (mMEP) under general anesthesia. In: Schramm J, Moller AR, editors. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Berlin: Springer; 1991. p. 72–87. - DOI
-
- mThuet ED, Winscher JC, Padberg AM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Dobbs MB, Schootman M, Luhmann SJ. Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a 23-year experience of 3436 surgical cases. Spine. 2010;35:1880–6. - DOI
-
- Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, Bacchin MR, Bonarelli S, Cioni A, Vommaro F, Fini N, Lolli F, Parisini P. The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:105–14. - PMC - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources