Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb;38(1):114-124.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03265-6. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

Updated review on the use of neuromuscular blockade during intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in the modern anesthesia era

Affiliations
Review

Updated review on the use of neuromuscular blockade during intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in the modern anesthesia era

Sirima Phoowanakulchai et al. J Anesth. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) monitoring is a common practice in neurosurgery to prevent postoperative neurological damage. However, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) during Tc-MEP monitoring is a subject of controversy. In addition, the effectiveness of sugammadex, a selective reversal agent, in the context of Tc-MEP monitoring requires further investigation. This review aimed to clarify the considerations involved in achieving optimal Tc-MEP monitoring while ensuring patient safety. Preoperative patient selection, comorbidity assessment, motor power evaluation, and the nature of the planned surgery are critical factors. Accurate paralysis assessment, continuous NMBA infusion, and post-tetanic stimulation techniques are essential for achieving optimal partial NMB. The decision to administer an NMB during Tc-MEP monitoring necessitates a careful evaluation of the balance between accuracy and potential complications. This review emphasizes the challenges associated with NMB administration during Tc-MEP monitoring and highlights the need for personalized patient assessment.

Keywords: Brain surgery; Neuromuscular blockade; Spine surgery; Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Merton P, Morton H. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature. 1980;285:227. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Taniguchi M, Schram J, Cedzich C. Recording of myogenic motor evoked potential (mMEP) under general anesthesia. In: Schramm J, Moller AR, editors. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Berlin: Springer; 1991. p. 72–87. - DOI
    1. mThuet ED, Winscher JC, Padberg AM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Dobbs MB, Schootman M, Luhmann SJ. Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a 23-year experience of 3436 surgical cases. Spine. 2010;35:1880–6. - DOI
    1. Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, Bacchin MR, Bonarelli S, Cioni A, Vommaro F, Fini N, Lolli F, Parisini P. The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:105–14. - PMC - DOI
    1. Malcharek MJ, Kulpok A, Deletis V, Ulkatan S, Sablotzki A, Hennig G, Gille J, Pilge S, Schneider G. Intraoperative multimodal evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study of 264 patients. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:1352–60. - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources