Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile asymmetry in patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study
- PMID: 37843635
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05308-4
Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile asymmetry in patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate social smile asymmetry in patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine on 3D stereophotogrammetric images.
Material and methods: The 3D social smile images of participants with unilateral impacted maxillary canine (n:20) and without impaction as a control group (n:20) were included. The images were recorded with a hand-held 3D stereophotogrammetry device (Fuel3D® Scanify®) and Geomagic Essentials 2 reverse engineering software were used for analyses. After the orientation process of the 3D records, the tissues around the smile area were divided into five morphological regions: cheek, upper lip lateral and medial, and lower lip lateral and medial. The deviation margins in the negative and positive directions for the 95% mesh rate and the total percentages of meshes between - 0.5- and + 0.5-mm deviations were calculated. ICC, paired samples t test, independent samples t test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analyses.
Results: In individuals with impacted canine, the amount of maximum positive deviation in the upper lip medial was 5.64 mm ± 1.46 and maximum negative deviation was - 4.6 mm ± 1.17. In the control group, mean of deviation limits for all parameters was less than 1.19 mm ± 2.62, while in individuals with unilateral impacted maxillary canine, the maximum value was 8.34 mm ± 2.23. The mesh percentage between - 0.5 and 0.5-mm deviations was over 95% in all morphological areas in the control group, while in the impacted canine group, the number of meshes within the specified deviation limits was less than 95%.
Conclusion: Individuals with unilateral impacted maxillary canine exhibit greater asymmetry in social smile compared to the control group, with the asymmetry being most prominent near the corners of the mouth and cheeks.
Clinical relevance: Amount of asymmetry was higher in impaction group compared to the control group in social smile. The quantification of a possible smile asymmetry due to the impacted canine is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic and/or orthognathic cases for ideal aesthetic results. Hence, smile asymmetry should not be overlooked and should be considered in diagnosis and treatment planning.
Keywords: 3D deviation analysis; Social smile asymmetry; Unilateral impacted maxillary canine.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine.J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Jul;82(4):226-235. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00285-3. Epub 2021 Mar 16. J Orofac Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33725142 English.
-
Is there a relationship between maxillary canine impaction and ocular asymmetry.J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Sep;80(5):236-241. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00189-3. Epub 2019 Aug 7. J Orofac Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31392346 English.
-
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on facial soft tissues : Deviation analysis on three-dimensional images.J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):242-50. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0033-5. Epub 2016 Jun 7. J Orofac Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27272054 Clinical Trial. English.
-
Unilateral agenesis of permanent superior canine in familial peg-shaped lateral incisors: rare case report and literature review.Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021 Oct-Dec;62(4):1045-1050. doi: 10.47162/RJME.62.4.17. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021. PMID: 35673824 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Capturing the smile: Exploring embodied and social acts of smiling.Sociol Health Illn. 2024 Nov;46(8):1626-1646. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13815. Epub 2024 Jul 4. Sociol Health Illn. 2024. PMID: 38963685 Review.
Cited by
-
3-Dimensional Evaluation of Enamel Thickness to Guide Orthodontic Interproximal Reduction: A CBCT-Based Study Across Gender and Ethnicity.Turk J Orthod. 2025 Jul 2;38(2):89-96. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2025.36. Turk J Orthod. 2025. PMID: 40619919 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR (2020) The impact of labial fixed appliance orthodontic treatment on patient expectation, experience, and satisfaction: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Orthod 42:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz043 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2007) Smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 77:759–765. https://doi.org/10.2319/082606-349 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zaidel DW, Cohen JA (2005) The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces. Int J Neu 115:1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450590914464 - DOI
-
- Rhodes G, Tremewan T (1996) Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychol Sci 7:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00338.x - DOI
-
- Little AC, Jones BC (2003) Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1759–1763 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources