The use of chimpanzee-modified faunal assemblages to investigate early hominin carnivory
- PMID: 37844154
- DOI: 10.1002/evan.22006
The use of chimpanzee-modified faunal assemblages to investigate early hominin carnivory
Abstract
Chimpanzees regularly hunt and consume prey smaller than themselves. It seems therefore likely that early hominins also consumed small vertebrate meat before they started using and producing stone tools. Research has focused on cut marks and large ungulates, but there is a small body of work that has investigated the range of bone modifications produced on small prey by chimpanzee mastication that, by analogy, can be used to identify carnivory in pre-stone tool hominins. Here, we review these works along with behavioral observations and other neo-taphonomic research. Despite some equifinality with bone modifications produced by baboons and the fact that prey species used in experiments seldom are similar to the natural prey of chimpanzees, we suggest that traces of chimpanzee mastication are sufficiently distinct from those of other predators that they can be used to investigate mastication of vertebrate prey by early hominins.
Keywords: actualism; bone surface modifications; chimpanzee; human evolution; meat eating; taphonomy.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aiello, L.C., Wheeler, P., 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology 36, 199-221.
-
- Bunn, H.T., 2006. Meat made us human. In: P. Ungar, editor. Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable (pp. 191-211). Oxford University Press.
-
- Isaac, G., 1978. The food-sharing behavior of protohuman hominids. Scientific American 238, 90-109.
-
- Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., 2002. Hunting and scavenging by early humans: the state of the debate. Journal of World Prehistory 16, 1-54.
-
- Pobiner, B.L., 2020. The zooarchaeology and paleoecology of early hominin scavenging. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 29(2), 68-82.