The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review
- PMID: 37845090
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101048
The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review" [Int. J. Orthopaed. Trauma Nurs. 53 (2024) 101048].Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2024 Nov;55:101125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101125. Epub 2024 Sep 6. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39244475 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery.
Method: Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase., Emcare, CINAHL and Scopus) were searched with no date or language limits. Two independent reviewers assessed articles against the inclusion criteria and methodological quality of the 3 included studies. Data was extracted using a customised data tool and included the intervention, study methods and outcomes of interest. A meta-analysis was performed, and results presented in narrative form with forest plots.
Findings: The three studies, one randomized control trial and two quasi-experimental studies, included 136 intervention and 228 control participants (Sample 364). The PJI rate decreased in the ciNPWT cohort compared to the conservative dressing cohort (2 [1.47%] vs 27 [11.84%]). The reoperation rate was lower in the ciNPWT cohort versus the conventional cohort (4 [2.94%] vs 35 [15.35%]). The rate of wound complications was significantly decreased in the ciNPWT cohort compared to the conventional dressing cohort (14 [10.29%] v 85 [37.28), p=<0.001).
Conclusion: Prophylactic application of ciNPWT may be effective in reducing wound complications, PJI and reoperation post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery. The added cost of ciNPWT may be justified in the reduction of wound complications, PJI and reoperation. Ongoing trials determining if the prophylactic application of ciNPWT post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery is beneficial in preventing PJI particularly in high risk patients with additional comorbidities are warranted.
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Hip revision arthroplasty; Infection; Knee revision arthroplasty; Negative pressure wound therapy; Periprosthetic joint infection.
Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Efficacy Between Closed Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Conventional Wound Management After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2804-2814. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 19. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 31288945
-
Use of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Infection: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):554-559.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 17. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 30545653 Clinical Trial.
-
Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improves Outcomes in Obese Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jul;40(7S1):S271-S276. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.004. Epub 2025 Mar 10. J Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 40074094
-
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2402-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.039. Epub 2020 Dec 3. J Arthroplasty. 2021. PMID: 33358608
-
Comparison of Surgical Site Complications With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Silver Impregnated Dressing in High-Risk Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Matched Cohort Study.J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3437-3442. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.030. Epub 2021 May 24. J Arthroplasty. 2021. PMID: 34140207
Cited by
-
Pressure makes diamonds? The impact of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on complications following abdominoplasty in patients with massive weight loss-results from a case controlled trial.JPRAS Open. 2024 Sep 11;42:197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.09.004. eCollection 2024 Dec. JPRAS Open. 2024. PMID: 39403390 Free PMC article.
-
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Proximal and Distal Femur Megaprosthetic Reconstructions after Bone Tumor Resections.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 28;60(1):1-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1802965. eCollection 2025 Feb. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025. PMID: 40297483 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical