Bond strength between denture lining material and CAD-CAM denture base resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37845114
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.001
Bond strength between denture lining material and CAD-CAM denture base resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Statement of problem: An effective bond between a denture lining material and the denture base resin is necessary for proper function. Regarding the new technologies for manufacturing denture bases, a systematic search of the literature on this topic is lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the bond strength between denture lining material and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) denture base resin (milled and 3-dimensionally printed) versus conventional denture base resin.
Material and methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) were independently searched by 4 researchers for relevant studies published up to April 2023. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question was: "Comparing conventional and CAD-CAM (milled and 3-dimensionally printed) denture base materials, which promote greater bond strength when associated with denture lining material?" A meta-analysis was performed based on mean ±standard deviation bond strength values between denture base resins and denture lining material with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Five in vitro studies were included. For bond strength, no difference was noted between conventional and milled denture base resin (confidence interval: -0.99 [-2.17 to 0.20]; heterogeneity: t2=0.57; Chi2:4.57; I2=78%; P=.10), and conventional resin had better values compared with those of 3-dimensionally (3D) printed (confidence interval: 3.03 [2.40-3.66]; heterogeneity: t2=0.00; Chi2:0.56; I2=0%; P<.001) when relined with soft materials. The milled denture base resin was better than the conventional (confidence interval: -0.85 [-1.33 to -0.38]; heterogeneity: Chi2:28.87; I2=93%; P<.001), with no difference between 3D printed and conventional (confidence interval: 0.18 [-4.23 to 4.59]; heterogeneity: t2=16.51; Chi2:130.99; I2=98%; P=.94) for hard liners.
Conclusions: The bond strength between resins for milled CAD-CAM denture bases and denture lining material was similar to that of conventional denture base resin, regardless of the consistency of the denture lining material. The bond strength to 3D printed CAD-CAM resin was lower than that of the milled version.
Copyright © 2025 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: Conventional versus CAD-CAM resin - A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1221-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 May 22. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. PMID: 34030891
-
Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of chairside hard liners bonded to traditional and contemporary CAD-CAM denture base polymers.J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Aug;134(2):472.e1-472.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.010. Epub 2025 Jun 16. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. PMID: 40527679
-
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Stability of 3D-Printed, Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and Conventional Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Denture Base Materials: An In Vitro Study.Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85128. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85128. eCollection 2025 May. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40599505 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of aging on attachment of Candida albicans to conventional heat-polymerized, CAD-CAM milled, and CAD-CAM 3D-printed acrylic resin bases.J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul;34(6):635-643. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13844. Epub 2024 Mar 19. J Prosthodont. 2025. PMID: 38502779
-
Mechanical properties of 3D printed prosthetic materials compared with milled and conventional processing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Aug;132(2):381-391. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Aug 5. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 35934576
Cited by
-
A Preliminary Stability Assessment of Three State-of-the-Art CAD/CAM Materials Under Human Gingival Cell Culture.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;17(2):221. doi: 10.3390/polym17020221. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39861293 Free PMC article.
-
Bond Strength of Nanocomposite Hard Liner to CAD-CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Conventionally Fabricated Denture Base Resins.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;12(9):275. doi: 10.3390/dj12090275. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39329841 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous