Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023:1438:127-133.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42003-0_21.

A Critical Analysis of Possible Mechanisms for the Oxygen Effect in Radiation Therapy with FLASH

Harold M Swartz  1   2   3 , Peter Vaupel  4   5 , Ann Barry Flood  6   7
Affiliations
Review

A Critical Analysis of Possible Mechanisms for the Oxygen Effect in Radiation Therapy with FLASH

Harold M Swartz et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023.

Abstract

The aim of this review is to stimulate readers to undertake appropriate investigations of the mechanism for a possible oxygen effect in FLASH. FLASH is a method of delivery of radiation that empirically, in animal models, appears to decrease the impact of radiation on normal tissues while retaining full effect on tumors. This has the potential for achieving a significantly increased effectiveness of radiation therapy. The mechanism is not known but, especially in view of the prominent role that oxygen has in the effects of radiation, investigations of mechanisms of FLASH have often focused on impacts of FLASH on oxygen levels. We and others have previously shown that simple differential depletion of oxygen directly changing the response to radiation is not a likely mechanism. In this review we consider how time-varying changes in oxygen levels could account for the FLASH effect by changing oxygen-dependent signaling in cells. While the methods of delivering FLASH are still evolving, current approaches for FLASH can differ from conventional irradiation in several ways that can impact the pattern of oxygen consumption: the rate of delivery of the radiation (40 Gy/s vs. 0.1 Gy/s), the time over which each fraction is delivered (e.g., <0.5 s. vs. 300 s), the delivery in pulses, the number of fractions, the size of the fractions, and the total duration of treatment. Taking these differences into account and recognizing that cell signaling is an intrinsic component of the need for cells to maintain steady-state conditions and, therefore, is activated by small changes in the environment, we delineate the potential time dependent changes in oxygen consumption and overview the cell signaling pathways whose differential activation by FLASH could account for the observed biological effects of FLASH. We speculate that the most likely pathways are those involved in repair of damaged DNA.

Keywords: Cancer; DNA damage repair; FLASH; Radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Al-Hallaq H, Cao M, Kruse J et al (2019) Cured in a FLASH: reducing normal tissue toxicities using ultra-high-dose rates. Int J Radiat Onc Biol Phys 104:257–260 - DOI
    1. Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V et al (2014) Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice. Sci Transl Med 6:245–293 - DOI
    1. Wilson JD, Hammond EM, Higgins GS et al (2020) Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy: silver bullet or fool’s gold? Front Oncol 9(1–12):1563 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Friedl AA, Prise KM, Butterworth KT, Montay-Gruel P, Favaudon V (2022) Radiobiology of the FLASH effect. Med Phys 49:1993–2013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen J, Beyreuther E, García-Calderón D, Karsch L, Knoll J, Pawelke J, Schürer M, Seco J (2022) Changes in radical levels as a cause for the FLASH effect: impact of beam structure parameters at ultra-high dose rates on oxygen depletion in water. Radiother Oncol 175:193–196 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources