Prevalence, risk indicators, and clinical characteristics of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis for an internal conical connection implant system: A multicenter cross-sectional study
- PMID: 37846763
- DOI: 10.1002/JPER.23-0355
Prevalence, risk indicators, and clinical characteristics of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis for an internal conical connection implant system: A multicenter cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Peri-implant disease prevalence is associated with a multifactorial etiology and distinct clinical characteristics of inflammation.
Methods: The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri-implant diseases, identify related risk indicators, and associate specific clinical characteristics to peri-implant biological complications in the medium term. Peri-implant diseases were classified according to established case criteria. Patients' data, implant and/or prosthetic features, and maintenance records were collected. Clinical characteristics such as bleeding on probing (BOP), suppuration (SUPP), keratinized mucosa (KM), probing depth (PD), marginal recession (MR), and modified plaque index (mPI) were recorded.
Results: Ninety-nine patients with 266 implants with a mean functional duration of 30.26 months were evaluated. Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis prevalence totaled to 49.5% and 15.15% (patient level), respectively. Peri-implant mucositis was associated with osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR] 6.09), age (OR 0.97), diabetes mellitus (OR 3.09), cemented-retained prosthesis (OR 3.81), and partial prosthesis (OR 2.21). Peri-implantitis was associated with osteoporosis (OR 7.74) and periodontitis (OR 2.74), cemented prosthesis (OR 10.12), partial and full arch prostheses (OR 12.35 and 19.86), implant diameter (OR 3.64), abutment transmucosal height (OR 3.39), and hygiene difficulty (OR 3.14). Furthermore, mPI score 3 (OR 3.27) and PD scores (OR 1.64) were associated with peri-implant mucositis, while mPI score 3 (OR 16.42), KM (OR 1.53), PD (OR 1.81), MR (OR 2.61), and the relationship between KM and PD (OR 0.63) were associated with peri-implantitis.
Conclusion: In the medium term, peri-implant diseases were correlated with factors inherent to the patient's conditions, presurgical treatment plan, and hygiene maintenance care. The knowledge of the mentioned factors and featured clinical characteristics can be crucial for disease prevention and establishment of a superior implant therapy prognosis.
Keywords: dental implants; dental implant‐abutment design; epidemiology; peri‐implantitis.
© 2023 American Academy of Periodontology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri‐implantitis. J Periodontol. 2018;89:S267‐S290.
-
- Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Guerrero A, et al. Peri‐implantitis: summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 6th EAO consensus conference 2021. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32:245‐253.
-
- Galarraga‐Vinueza ME, Obreja K, Ramanauskaite A, et al. Macrophage polarization in peri‐implantitis lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:2335‐2344.
-
- Galárraga‐Vinueza ME, Tangl S, Bianchini M, et al. Histological characteristics of advanced peri‐implantitis bone defects in humans. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:12.
-
- Matarazzo F, Sabóia‐Gomes R, Alves BES, de Oliveira RP, Araújo MG. Prevalence, extent and severity of peri‐implant diseases. A cross‐sectional study based on a university setting in Brazil. J Periodontal Res. 2018;53:910‐915.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
