Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Nov:246:105347.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105347. Epub 2023 Oct 15.

Neural correlates of pronoun processing: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neural correlates of pronoun processing: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis

Loubna El Ouardi et al. Brain Lang. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Pronouns are unique linguistic devices that allow for the expression of referential relationships. Despite their communicative utility, the neural correlates of the operations involved in reference assignment and/or resolution, are not well-understood. The present study synthesized the neuroimaging literature on pronoun processing to test extant theories of pronoun comprehension. Following the PRISMA guidelines and thebest-practice recommendations for neuroimaging meta-analyses, a systematic literature search and record assessment were performed. As a result, 16 fMRI studies were included in the meta-analysis, and were coded in Scribe 3.6 for inclusion in the BrainMap database. The activation coordinates for the contrasts of interest were transformed into Talairach space and submitted to an Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analysis in GingerALE 3.0.1. The results indicated that pronoun processing had functional convergence in the left posterior middle and superior temporal gyri, potentially reflecting the retrieval, prediction and integration roles of these areas for pronoun processing.

Keywords: Activation likelihood estimation; Language; Meta-analysis; Pronoun; Sentence processing; fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Summary of the predictions of the three neurobiological models, showing regions that are unique to each model (green, purple and orange) and overlapping across models (blue and yellow).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PRISMA flowchart summarizing the study selection process.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Results of the P> B ALE meta-analysis. Notes: G: gyrus; IF: inferior frontal; L: left; MF: middle frontal; P: precentral; MT: middle temporal; ST: superior temporal
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Neural architecture and components of the proposed Retrieval and Integration model of pronoun processing. Notes: Activations that correspond to antecedent retrieval and predictive processing are color-coded in green (in L pMTG). Activations that correspond to antecedent integration are color-coded in blue (in L pSTG). The model accommodates activity in other neural regions such as left IFG, PP, and AG (in dashes) based on the specific linguistic context and task in which the pronoun needs to be comprehended. G: gyrus; A: angular; IF: inferior frontal; L: left; MF: middle frontal; P: precentral; pMT: posterior middle temporal; PP: posterior parietal; pST: Posterior superior.

References

    1. Aggleton JP, & Brown MW (2006). Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 455–463. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almor A, Nair VA, Boiteau TW, & Vendemia JMC (2017). The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse. Brain and Language, 173, 52–66. 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.06.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almor A, Smith DV, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J, & Rorden C (2007). What is in a name? Spatial brain circuits are used to track discourse references. NeuroReport, 18(12), 1215–1219. 10.1097/wnr.0b013e32810f2e11 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold JE, Eisenband JG, Brown-Schmidt S, & Trueswell JC (2000). The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76(1), B13–B26. 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00073-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baggio G, & Hagoort P (2011). The balance between memory and unification in semantics: A dynamic account of the N400. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1338–1367. 10.1080/01690965.2010.542671 - DOI

Publication types