Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Oct 17;18(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00517-4.

Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]

Georgios Polychronidis  1   2 , Nuh N Rahbari  3 , Thomas Bruckner  4 , Anja Sander  4 , Florian Sommer  5 , Selami Usta  6 , Janssen Hermann  7 , Max Benjamin Albers  8 , Mine Sargut  9 , Phillip Knebel  1 , Rosa Klotz  10   11
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]

Georgios Polychronidis et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Background: High-level evidence regarding the technique of abdominal wall closure for patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy is sparse. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies after primary emergency midline laparotomy.

Methods/design: CONTINT was a multi-center pragmatic open-label exploratory randomized controlled parallel trial. Two different abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary midline laparotomy for an emergency surgical intervention with a suspected septic focus in the abdominal cavity were compared: the continuous, all-layer suture and the interrupted suture technique. The primary composite endpoint was burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery or incisional hernia within 12 months. As reliable data on this composite primary endpoint were not available for patients undergoing emergency surgery, it was planned to initially recruit 80 patients and conduct an interim analysis after these had completed the 12 months follow-up.

Results: From August 31, 2009, to June 28, 2012, 124 patients were randomized of whom 119 underwent surgery and were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principal. The primary composite endpoint did not differ between the continuous suture (C: 27.1%) and the interrupted suture group (I: 30.0%). None of the individual components of the primary endpoint (reoperation due to burst abdomen after 30 days (C: 13.5%, I: 15.1%) and reoperation due to incisional hernia (C: 3.0%, I:11.1%)) differed between groups. Time needed for fascial closure was longer in the interrupted suture group (C: 12.8 ± 4.5 min, I: 17.4 ± 6.1 min). BMI was associated with burst abdomen during the first 30 days with an OR of 1.17 (95% CI 1.04-1.32).

Conclusion: This RCT showed no difference between continuous suture with slowly absorbable suture versus interrupted rapidly absorbable sutures after primary emergency midline laparotomy in rates of postoperative burst abdomen and incisional hernia after one year. However, the trial was stopped after the interim analysis due to futility as there was no chance to show superiority of one suture technique.

Keywords: Abdominal wall closure; Emergency surgery; Incisional hernia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram of trial conduct
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clarke, J.R., et al. Time to laparotomy for intra-abdominal bleeding from trauma does affect survival for delays up to 90 minutes. 2002. 52(3): p. 420–425. - PubMed
    1. Tran DT-A, et al. Standard of care and outcomes of primary laparotomy versus laparotomy in patients with prior open abdominal surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(10):2600–2609. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04904-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlson MA. Acute wound failure. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):607–636. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70571-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Ramshorst GH, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thorup T, Tolstrup MB, Gogenur I. Reduced rate of incisional hernia after standardized fascial closure in emergency laparotomy. Hernia. 2019;23(2):341–346. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01893-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types