Examining trait-like factors as predictors of state-level responses to food intake in women with bulimia nervosa, purging disorder, and controls
- PMID: 37850623
- PMCID: PMC10841483
- DOI: 10.1002/eat.24077
Examining trait-like factors as predictors of state-level responses to food intake in women with bulimia nervosa, purging disorder, and controls
Abstract
Objective: Theories suggest that elevated negative affect and weight/shape concerns explain both who is affected by bulimic symptoms as well as when bulimic symptoms occur, suggesting that individual differences predict within-subject differences. However, few studies have tested this theoretical premise.
Method: In the present study, participants (N = 119) diagnosed with bulimia nervosa (N = 57), purging disorder (N = 31), and non-eating disorder controls (N = 31) completed measures of negative affect and weight/shape concerns and later made momentary affect and weight/shape concerns ratings before and after an ad lib meal.
Results: State negative affect and weight/shape concerns increased post-meal. No moderating effect of trait negative affect was observed for state affect. In contrast, between-subject differences in weight/shape concerns moderated within-subject increases in state weight/shape concerns. Diagnostic group did not account for this effect.
Discussion: Findings point to viable treatment targets for disordered eating. Targeting elevated weight/shape concerns early in interventions could facilitate reductions in purging after food intake for bulimia nervosa and purging disorder.
Public significance: In the present study, individual differences in weight/shape concerns at baseline predicted greater increases in state weight/shape concerns following eating. These effects were maintained when considering possible differences related to presence and type of eating disorder. Results suggest that targeting weight/shape concerns earlier in treatment may be important for reducing maladaptive responses to eating across eating disorders.
Keywords: affect; bulimia nervosa; purging disorder; weight concerns.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Clinical features and physiological response to a test meal in purging disorder and bulimia nervosa.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;64(9):1058-66. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.9.1058. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17768271
-
Satiation deficits and binge eating: Probing differences between bulimia nervosa and purging disorder using an ad lib test meal.Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Appetite. 2018. PMID: 29654850 Free PMC article.
-
Distinguishing Between Risk Factors for Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, and Purging Disorder.J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Aug;44(8):1580-91. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0186-8. Epub 2014 Sep 19. J Youth Adolesc. 2015. PMID: 25233874
-
Affective processes underlying restrictive eating in atypical anorexia nervosa: Comparisons to anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa using ecological momentary assessment.Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr;57(4):879-891. doi: 10.1002/eat.24134. Epub 2024 Jan 8. Int J Eat Disord. 2024. PMID: 38192012
-
[Eating disorders - diagnosis and characteristics].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020 Apr 22;48(284):133-138. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020. PMID: 32352948 Review. Polish.
References
-
- Beck AT, Ward C, & Mendelson M. (1961). “Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)”. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. - PubMed
-
- Berg KC, Cao L, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Peterson CB, Crow SJ, Le Grange D, Mitchell JE, Lavender JM, Durkin N, & Wonderlich SA (2017). Negative affect and binge eating: Reconciling differences between two analytic approaches in ecological momentary assessment research. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50(10), 1222–1230. 10.1002/eat.22770 - DOI - PMC - PubMed