Does Fibular Displacement Predict Tibial Malrotation in Simulated Tibia-Fibula Fractures
- PMID: 37850972
- DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00043
Does Fibular Displacement Predict Tibial Malrotation in Simulated Tibia-Fibula Fractures
Abstract
Introduction: Tibial malrotation can occur with medullary nailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures. Fibular alignment has been proposed as a surrogate for axial plane reduction intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fibular alignment is a reliable marker of accurate tibial rotation.
Methods: Deidentified CT scans of 50 patients with normal tibial anatomy were selected. Using ImageJ software, we simulated osteotomies at three sites (proximal third, mid-diaphysis, and distal third). We overlaid adjacent CT slices and rotated them around the central axis of the tibia in 5° increments of external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR). At each increment, measurements of fibular overlap (%) were obtained from anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. To simulate fixation of the fibula, we repeated rotation around the axis of the fibula with and without a simulated medullary implant in the tibia.
Results: A total of 50 patients were included. The mean age was 62 years, average BMI was 25.8, and 28 of 50 patients (56%) were male. Earliest loss of fibular contact occurred at 24° ER and 22° IR at the proximal site. Contact was lost at 26° ER and 28° IR on the AP view and 42° ER and 29° IR on the lateral view. The mean fibular contact at each 5° increment was similar for ER and IR. Fibular contact was reduced to 50% at 10 to 15° of rotation in ER and IR at all sites. Tibial canal contact was lost at 24° in both ER and IR around the fibula. With a virtual medullary implant, the mean maximal rotation was 6°.
Discussion: Surgeons should be aware that 20° or more of malrotation is likely present when fibular contact is lost during medullary nailing of the tibia. Greater than 50% loss of contact should raise suspicion for malrotation. A fixed fibula and medullary tibial implant theoretically preclude significant tibial malrotation.
Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
References
-
- Cain ME, Hendrickx LAM, Bleeker NJ, Lambers KTA, Doornberg JN, Jaarsma RL: Prevalence of rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Can we reliably use the contralateral uninjured side as the reference standard?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:582-591
-
- Say F, Bülbül M: Findings related to rotational malalignment in tibial fractures treated with reamed intramedullary nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134:1381-1386
-
- Prasad CV, Khalid M, McCarthy P, O'Sullivan ME: CT assessment of torsion following locked intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Injury 1999;30:467-470
-
- Theriault B, Turgeon AF, Pelet S: Functional impact of tibial malrotation following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:2033-2039
-
- Clementz BG: Assessment of tibial torsion and rotational deformity with a new fluoroscopic technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;245:199-209.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical