A decade of progress in juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatments and outcomes in Canada: results from ReACCh-Out and the CAPRI registry
- PMID: 37851400
- PMCID: PMC11381684
- DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead560
A decade of progress in juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatments and outcomes in Canada: results from ReACCh-Out and the CAPRI registry
Erratum in
-
Correction to: A decade of progress in juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatments and outcomes in Canada: results from ReACCh-Out and the CAPRI registry.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(SI2):SI269. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead686. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024. PMID: 38145453 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To assess changes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatments and outcomes in Canada, comparing 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 inception cohorts.
Methods: Patients enrolled within three months of diagnosis in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) and the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators Registry (CAPRI) cohorts were included. Cumulative incidences of drug starts and outcome attainment within 70 weeks of diagnosis were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression.
Results: The 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 cohorts included 1128 and 721 patients, respectively. JIA category distribution and baseline clinical juvenile idiopathic arthritis disease activity (cJADAS10) scores at enrolment were comparable. By 70 weeks, 6% of patients (95% CI 5, 7) in the 2005-2010 and 26% (23, 30) in the 2017-2021 cohort had started a biologic DMARD (bDMARD), and 43% (40, 47) and 60% (56, 64) had started a conventional DMARD (cDMARD), respectively. Outcome attainment was 64% (61, 67) and 83% (80, 86) for inactive disease (Wallace criteria), 69% (66, 72) and 84% (81, 87) for minimally active disease (cJADAS10 criteria), 57% (54, 61) and 63% (59, 68) for pain control (<1/10), and 52% (47, 56) and 54% (48, 60) for good health-related quality of life (≥9/10).
Conclusion: Although baseline disease characteristics were comparable in the 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 cohorts, cDMARD and bDMARD use increased with a concurrent increase in minimally active and inactive disease. Improvements in parent and patient-reported outcomes were smaller than improvements in disease activity.
Keywords: juvenile arthritis; outcomes; prognosis; treatment.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


References
-
- Martini A, Lovell DJ, Albani S et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022;8:5. - PubMed
-
- Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P et al. ; International League of Associations for Rheumatology. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol 2004;31:390–2. - PubMed
-
- Hinze C, Gohar F, Foell D. Management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: hitting the target. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015;11:290–300. - PubMed
-
- Guzman J, Oen K, Tucker LB et al. ; ReACCh-Out Investigators. The outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children managed with contemporary treatments: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1854–60. - PubMed
-
- Batthish M, Berard R, Cabral D et al. ; Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators. A new Canadian inception cohort for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators Registry. Rheumatology 2020;59:2796–805. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical