Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 23;127(46):9842-9852.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c05559. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

Quantification of the Ionic Character of Multiconfigurational Wave Functions: The Qat Diagnostic

Affiliations

Quantification of the Ionic Character of Multiconfigurational Wave Functions: The Qat Diagnostic

Silmar A do Monte et al. J Phys Chem A. .

Abstract

The complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method is a cornerstone in modern excited-state quantum chemistry providing the starting point for most common multireference computations. However, CASSCF, when used with a minimal active space, can produce significant errors (>2 eV) even for the excitation energies of simple hydrocarbons if the states of interest possess ionic character. After illustrating this problem in some detail, we present a diagnostic for ionic character, denoted as Q at, that is readily computed from the transition density. A set of 11 molecules is considered to study errors in vertical excitation energies. State-averaged CASSCF obtains a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.87 eV for the 34 singlet states considered. We highlight a strong correlation between the obtained errors and the Q at diagnostic, illustrating its power to predict problematic cases. Conversely, using multireference configuration interaction with single and double excitations and Pople's size extensivity correction (MR-CISD+P), excellent results are obtained with an MAE of 0.11 eV. Furthermore, correlations with the Q at diagnostic disappear. In summary, we hope that the presented diagnostic will facilitate reliable and user-friendly multireference computations on conjugated organic molecules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of the molecules considered in this work.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example showing the covalent triplet and ionic singlet states of ethene using delocalized canonical MOs (left) and localized MOs (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transition densities between the ground state and the lowest two singlet states of naphthalene computed at SA-CASSCF (a,b) and MRCISD (c,d) levels of theory (isovalue: 0.001 au).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall errors of vertical excitation energies for SA-CASSCF and various MR-CI variants (using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set) computed for the 11 molecules considered in this work. Results are reported as mean absolute and signed errors (MAE, MSE) determined separately for singlet and triplet states.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Errors of computed vertical singlet excitation energies plotted against the Qat diagnostic measuring ionic character using (a) SA-CASSCF, (b) MR-CIS, (c) MR-CISD, and (d) MR-CISD + P, all using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. States are grouped according to type: ππ* (circles) and nπ* (squares) states; the out-of-plane ππ* state of cyanoformaldehyde is shown as an empty circle.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of the transition densities of the covalent and ionic ππ* states for three selected molecules computed at the SA-CASSCF/aug-cc-pVDZ level. Qat descriptors and errors of vertical excitation energies are given below each plot.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Errors of computed vertical singlet excitation energies plotted against the Ω descriptor measuring single excitation character using (a) SA-CASSCF, (b) MR-CIS, (c) MR-CISD, and (d) MR-CISD + P, all using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. States are grouped according to type: ππ* (circles) and nπ* (squares) states; the out-of-plane ππ* state of cyanoformaldehyde is shown as an empty circle.

References

    1. González L.; Escudero D.; Serrano-Andrés L. Progress and challenges in the calculation of electronic excited states. ChemPhysChem 2012, 13, 28–51. 10.1002/cphc.201100200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plasser F.; Barbatti M.; Aquino A. J. A.; Lischka H. Electronically excited states and photodynamics: a continuing challenge. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2012, 131, 1073.10.1007/s00214-011-1073-y. - DOI
    1. Lischka H.; Nachtigallová D.; Aquino A. J. A.; Szalay P.; Plasser F.; Machado F. B. C.; Barbatti M. Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 7293–7361. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park J. W.; Al-Saadon R.; MacLeod M. K.; Shiozaki T.; Vlaisavljevich B. Multireference Electron Correlation Methods: Journeys along Potential Energy Surfaces. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 5878–5909. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00496. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szymczak J. J.; Barbatti M.; Lischka H. Influence of the active space on CASSCF nonadiabatic dynamics simulations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2011, 111, 3307–3315. 10.1002/qua.22978. - DOI