Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 18;13(1):17746.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45140-0.

Estimation of right lobe graft weight for living donor liver transplantation using deep learning-based fully automatic computed tomographic volumetry

Affiliations

Estimation of right lobe graft weight for living donor liver transplantation using deep learning-based fully automatic computed tomographic volumetry

Xiaopeng Yang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study aimed at developing a fully automatic technique for right lobe graft weight estimation using deep learning algorithms. The proposed method consists of segmentation of the full liver region from computed tomography (CT) images, classification of the entire liver region into the right and left lobes, and estimation of the right lobe graft weight from the CT-measured right lobe graft volume using a volume-to-weight conversion formula. The first two steps were performed with a transformer-based deep learning model. To train and evaluate the model, a total of 248 CT datasets (188 for training, 40 for validation, and 20 for testing and clinical evaluation) were used. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) were used for evaluating the segmentation accuracy of the full liver region and the right liver lobe. The correlation coefficient (CC), percentage error (PE), and percentage absolute error (PAE) were used for the clinical evaluation of the estimated right lobe graft weight. The proposed method achieved high accuracy in segmentation for DSC, MSD, and HD95 (95.9% ± 1.0%, 1.2 ± 0.4 mm, and 5.2 ± 1.9 mm for the entire liver region; 92.4% ± 2.7%, 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, and 8.8 ± 2.9 mm for the right lobe) and in clinical evaluation for CC, PE, and PAE (0.859, - 1.8% ± 9.6%, and 8.6% ± 4.7%). For the right lobe graft weight estimation, the present study underestimated the graft weight by - 1.8% on average. A mean difference of - 21.3 g (95% confidence interval: - 55.7 to 13.1, p = 0.211) between the estimated graft weight and the actual graft weight was achieved in this study. The proposed method is effective for clinical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preparation of the ground truth images of the entire liver region and the left and right liver lobes. PV = portal vein, HV = hepatic vein.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proposed deep learning-based technique for classifying the liver into the right and left lobes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of segmentation results using the proposed deep learning-based technique. (A) The entire liver region. (B) The right liver lobe.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The plot of intraoperatively measured graft weight to CT measured graft volume using the proposed deep learning-based method.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Bland–Altman plot of the difference between the predicted graft weight using the proposed deep learning-based method and the intraoperatively measured graft weight.

References

    1. Yang X, et al. Estimation of right-lobe graft weight from computed tomographic volumetry for living donor liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 2017;49:303–308. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hwang S, Lee SG, Joh JW, Suh KS, Kim DG. Liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: Comparison between cadaveric donor and living donor liver transplantations. Liver Transplant. 2005;11:1265–1272. doi: 10.1002/lt.20549. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiuchi T, et al. Small-for-size graft in living donor liver transplantation: How far should we go? Liver Transplant. 2003;9:S29–S35. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heaton N. Small-for-size liver syndrome after auxiliary and split liver transplantation: Donor selection. Liver Transplant. 2003;9:S26–S28. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50197. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugawara Y, et al. Small-for-size grafts in living-related liver transplantation. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2001;192:510–513. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00800-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types