Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 26;26(10):108044.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108044. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.

Biomarkers of alcohol abuse potentially predict delirium, delirium duration and mortality in critically ill patients

Affiliations

Biomarkers of alcohol abuse potentially predict delirium, delirium duration and mortality in critically ill patients

Nikolaus Schreiber et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) and the γ-glutamyltransferase-CDT derived Anttila-Index are established biomarkers for sustained heavy alcohol consumption and their potential role to predict delirium and mortality in critically ill patients is not clear. In our prospective observational study, we included 343 consecutive patients admitted to our ICU, assessed the occurrence of delirium and investigated its association with biomarkers of alcohol abuse measured on the day of ICU admission. 35% of patients developed delirium during ICU stay. We found significantly higher CDT levels (p = 0.011) and Anttila-Index (p = 0.001) in patients with delirium. CDT above 1.7% (OR 2.06), CDT per percent increase (OR 1.26, AUROC 0.75), and Anttila-Index per unit increase (OR 1.28, AUROC 0.74) were associated with delirium development in adjusted regression models. Anttila-Index and CDT also correlated with delirium duration exceeding 5 days. Additionally, Anttila-Index above 4, Anttila-Index per unit increase, and CDT per percent increase were independently associated with hospital mortality.

Keywords: clinical finding; medical science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Potential predictors for development of ICU-delirium (A–D) Predicted probabilities to develop ICU delirium were derived from binary logistic regression for (A) Anttila-Index (p < 0.001), (B) carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) (p = 0.008), (C) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-score (p < 0.001), and (D) serum albumin (p < 0.001), respectively. Shaded areas depict 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin and Anttila-Index are potential predictors of ICU-delirium (A–C) Multivariable logistic regression models for (A) carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) above cutoff 1.7% (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.10–3.84, p = 0.023), (B) CDT per percent increase (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03–1.60, p = 0.036), and (C) Anttila-Index per unit increase (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04–1.60, p = 0.023) after adjustment for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-score, serum albumin, mechanical ventilation and age. p values of Hosmer-Lemeshow-Tests were 0.74, 0.83, and 0.98, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves for CDT [%] and the Anttila-Index Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the predictive and discriminative ability of CDT (black line) and the Anttila-Index (gray line) for development of ICU-delirium are shown. Respective areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) are depicted as well. AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; CDT, Carbohydrate deficient transferrin; ICU, Intensive care unit.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier survival curve 30-day Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for critically ill patients with Anttila-Index below 4 (black line) and Anttila-Index above 4 (gray line). Three patients were not considered because of missing values for γ-glutamyltransferase.

References

    1. Ouimet S., Kavanagh B.P., Gottfried S.B., Skrobik Y. Incidence, risk factors and consequences of ICU delirium. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:66–73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0399-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stollings J.L., Kotfis K., Chanques G., Pun B.T., Pandharipande P.P., Ely E.W. Delirium in critical illness: clinical manifestations, outcomes, and management. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1089–1103. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06503-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye S.K., Westendorp R.G.J., Saczynski J.S. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383:911–922. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wassenaar A., van den Boogaard M., van Achterberg T., Slooter A.J.C., Kuiper M.A., Hoogendoorn M.E., Simons K.S., Maseda E., Pinto N., Jones C., et al. Multinational development and validation of an early prediction model for delirium in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1048–1056. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3777-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Awissi D.-K., Lebrun G., Fagnan M., Skrobik Y., Regroupement de Soins Critiques Réseau de Soins Respiratoires Québec. Réseau de Soins Respiratoires, Québec Alcohol, nicotine, and iatrogenic withdrawals in the ICU. Crit. Care Med. 2013;41:S57–S68. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16919. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources