Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2023 Dec 1;9(12):1702-1707.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4423.

Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Gulam A Manji et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Combining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma; however, whether this combination has activity in the perioperative setting remains unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of perioperative chemotherapy and ICB followed by maintenance ICB in resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Design, setting, and participants: This investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, single-stage, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial screened 49 patients and enrolled 36 patients with resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinoma from February 10, 2017, to June 17, 2021, with a median (range) follow-up of 35.2 (17.4-73.0) months. Thirty-four patients were deemed evaluable for efficacy analysis, with 28 (82.4%) undergoing curative resection. This study was performed at 4 referral institutions in the US.

Interventions: Patients received 3 cycles of capecitabine, 625 mg/m2, orally twice daily for 21 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2, intravenously and pembrolizumab, 200 mg, intravenously with optional epirubicin, 50 mg/m2, every 3 weeks before and after surgery with an additional cycle of pembrolizumab before surgery. Patients received 14 additional doses of maintenance pembrolizumab.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary end points included overall response rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: A total of 34 patients (median [range] age, 65.5 [25-90] years; 23 [67.6%] male) were evaluable for efficacy. Of these patients, 28 (82.4%) underwent curative resection, 7 (20.6%; 95% CI, 10.1%-100%) achieved pCR, and 6 (17.6%) achieved a pathologic near-complete response. Of the 28 patients who underwent resection, 4 (14.3%) experienced disease recurrence. The median DFS and OS were not reached. The 2-year DFS was 67.8% (95% CI, 0.53%-0.87%) and the OS was 80.6% (95% CI, 0.68%-0.96%). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events for evaluable patients occurred in 20 patients (57.1%), and 12 (34.3%) experienced immune-related grade 3 or higher adverse events.

Conclusion and relevance: In this trial of unselected patients with resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and pembrolizumab resulted in a pCR rate of 20.6% and was well tolerated. This trial met its primary end point and supports the development of checkpoint inhibition in combination with perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02918162.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Manji reported receiving grants from Genentech/Roche, Merck, Regeneron Pharm, BioLineRx, and Arcus Biosciences and serving on the advisory boards for CEND Pharm and Ipsen Pharm outside the submitted work. Dr Lee reported consulting for PTC Therapeutics. Dr Negri was affiliated with Columbia University during the time this research was conducted and completed; the research discussed in this publication represents work completed prior to her current employment with Takeda, which sponsors an unrelated clinical trial. The opinions expressed in this publication solely represent the views of the authors and do not reflect the opinions or interests of Takeda. Dr Sethi reported receiving personal fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic Consulting, and Interscope Consulting and research support from ERBE, Fujifilm, and Olympus outside the submitted work. Dr Park reported receiving grants from Ambrx, Aprea Therapeutics, Bayer Corporation, BeiGene Company Limited, BJ Biosciences Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Genentech Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, ImmuneOncia, Incyte Corporation, Jounce Therapeutics Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, MacroGenics Inc, Mabspace Biosciences, Mirati Therapeutics, Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Oncologie, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer Inc, PsiOxus Therapeutics Ltd, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Synermore Biologics Company Ltd, EMD Serono, Seattle Genetics, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc, Turning Point Therapeutics, Vedanta Biosciences Inc, Xencor Inc, Bolt, Mersana, Tizona, and Exelixis. Dr Shah reported receiving grants from Merck, Bristol Meyers Squibb, and Oncolys Biopharma outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Tumor Response
A, Waterfall plot depicting Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 response to capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and pembrolizumab (COP) therapy before resection (n = 16). Corresponding pathologic response by College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria, pathologic differentiation, and baseline programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive scoring (PD-L1 CPS) score are shown. B, Comparison of baseline endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with pathologic staging by TNM criteria (T stage, left; N stage, right). C, Correlation of baseline EUS staging with pathologic response after COP therapy by CAP criteria.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Disease-Free and Overall Survival
Kaplan-Meier curve for disease-free survival and overall survival for the 34 evaluable patients. Median overall survival and disease-free survival were not reached.

References

    1. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. ; MAGIC Trial Participants . Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11-20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055531 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. ; FLOT4-AIO Investigators . Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1948-1957. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang Y-J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: the KEYNOTE-062 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1571-1580. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3370 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al. . Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(5):e180013-e180013. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, et al. . Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1715-1721. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0597 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

Associated data