Cost effectiveness of using trastuzumab biosimilars compared to trastuzumab original drugs to treat breast cancer in a hospital setting
- PMID: 37857129
- PMCID: PMC10587754
- DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103588
Cost effectiveness of using trastuzumab biosimilars compared to trastuzumab original drugs to treat breast cancer in a hospital setting
Abstract
Introduction: Subcutaneous (SC) drug administration, such as the Herceptin® in an oncology day hospital reduces the administration time of trastuzumab. In the context of combination therapy administration, this time-saving may be called into question. The challenge posed by the deployment of much less expensive IV biosimilar forms raises questions about the cost-effectiveness of SC administration.
Methods: Using data from a french Diagnostic Related Groups regarding prescriptions of intravenous Herceptin® (HIV), Herceptin® biosimilar IV (BSIV), and Herceptin® subcutaneous (HSC), we conducted two simulations. This simulation involved replacing all HSC with BSIV in combination therapy administration (Simulation 1) and subsequently substituting IV forms with SC forms only when prescribed as monotherapy (Simulation 2). A cost-benefit analysis was conducted based on these two simulations, from the hospital's perspective, for Normandy's population over a 1-year timeframe.
Results: In Simulation 1, there was an average cost-saving of €12 per patient per year, but it resulted in a loss of 10140 min, equivalent to 10 min per patient per year when compared to the current situation. Simulation 2 yielded average cost-savings for the hospital amounting to €51 per patient per year, along with a time-saving of 67 min per patient per year compared to the current situation.
Conclusions: The development of a program aimed at optimizing the prescription of Trastuzumab holds the potential to deliver significant cost-savings to hospitals while enhancing the quality of service provided to the patients. This optimization involves using H SC in monotherapy and BS IV in combination therapy administration.
Keywords: Biosimilar pharmaceuticals; Costs and cost analysis; Economics; Health policy; Neoplasms; Patient preference; Pharmaceutical.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures






References
-
- Valachis A., Sundqvist M., Carlsson L., et al. Use of subcutaneous and intravenous trastuzumab: real-world experience from three hospitals in Sweden. Future Oncol. août. 2019;15(23):2733–2741. - PubMed
-
- Olsen J., Jensen K.F., Olesen D.S., Knoop A. Costs of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. J Comp Eff Res. 2018 May;7(5):411–419. - PubMed
-
- Cebas A.L., Cascajares S.C., Bravo S.P., et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of trastuzumab: preference of HER2+ breast cancer patients and financial impact of its use. J BUON. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):334–339. - PubMed
-
- Pivot X., Spano J.P., Espie M., et al. Patients' preference of trastuzumab administration (subcutaneous versus intravenous) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: results of the randomised MetaspHer study. Eur J Cancer. sept. 2017;82:230–236. - PubMed
-
- Pivot X., Gligorov J., Müller V., et al. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PrefHer): an open-label randomised study. Lancet Oncol. sept. 2013;14(10):962–970. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical