Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 19:20:E93.
doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230056.

Self-Collection for Primary HPV Testing: Perspectives on Implementation From Federally Qualified Health Centers

Affiliations

Self-Collection for Primary HPV Testing: Perspectives on Implementation From Federally Qualified Health Centers

Amanda Le et al. Prev Chronic Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: Primary testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) by self-collection could result in higher rates of cervical cancer screening. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in the US serve a large proportion of women who have low income and no health insurance and are medically underserved - risk factors for being insufficiently screened for cervical cancer. Although the implementation of self-collection for HPV testing is not yet widespread, health care entities need to prepare for its eventual approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. We conducted focus groups and interviews among clinical and administrative staff and leadership to gather data on key logistical concerns that must be addressed before implementing self-collection for HPV testing in FQHCs.

Methods: We identified focus group and interview participants from 6 FQHCs in North Carolina. We conducted focus groups with clinical and administrative staff (N = 45) and semistructured interviews with chief executive officers, senior-level administrators, chief medical officers, and clinical data managers (N = 24). Transcripts were coded by using codebooks derived from research questions and notes taken during data collection. Themes emerged on implementation of self-collection for HPV testing. We applied the constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to themes to identify domains of potential barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Results: Clinical personnel reported that offering self-collection for HPV testing is acceptable and feasible and can increase cervical cancer screening rates. Uncertainties emerged about accuracy of results, workflow disruptions, financial implications, and effects on clinic quality measures.

Conclusion: Implementing self-collection for HPV testing was considered feasible and acceptable by participants. However, important health service delivery considerations, including financial implications, must be addressed before integrating self-collection for HPV testing into the standard of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. ; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2018;320(7):674–86. 10.1001/jama.2018.10897 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al. ; 2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference. 2012 Updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. [published correction appears in J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17(3):367]. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17(5 Suppl 1):S1–27. 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318287d329 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmann S, Mouchawar J, Bischoff K, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(9):675–83. 10.1093/jnci/dji115 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winstead E. Why are many women overdue for cervical cancer screening? National Cancer Institute. Published February 2, 2022. Accessed October 13, 2022. https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2022/overdue-cer...
    1. Akers AY, Newmann SJ, Smith JS. Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States. Curr Probl Cancer 2007;31(3):157–81. 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2007.01.001 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms