Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;10(2):e000963.
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-000963.

Identification and assessment of classification criteria attributes for systemic lupus erythematosus in a regional medical record data network

Affiliations

Identification and assessment of classification criteria attributes for systemic lupus erythematosus in a regional medical record data network

Noah Forrest et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the application and utility of algorithms designed to detect features of SLE in electronic health record (EHR) data in a multisite, urban data network.

Methods: Using the Chicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (CAPriCORN), a Clinical Data Research Network (CDRN) containing data from multiple healthcare sites, we identified patients with at least one positively identified criterion from three SLE classification criteria sets developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1997, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) in 2012, and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology and the ACR in 2019 using EHR-based algorithms. To measure the algorithms' performance in this data setting, we first evaluated whether the number of clinical encounters for SLE was associated with a greater quantity of positively identified criteria domains using Poisson regression. We next quantified the amount of SLE criteria identified at a single healthcare institution versus all sites to assess the amount of SLE-related information gained from implementing the algorithms in a CDRN.

Results: Patients with three or more SLE encounters were estimated to have documented 2.77 (2.73 to 2.80) times the number of positive SLE attributes from the 2012 SLICC criteria set than patients without an SLE encounter via Poisson regression. Patients with three or more SLE-related encounters and with documented care from multiple institutions were identified with more SLICC criteria domains when data were included from all CAPriCORN sites compared with a single site (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The positive association observed between amount of SLE-related clinical encounters and the number of criteria domains detected suggests that the algorithms used in this study can be used to help describe SLE features in this data environment. This work also demonstrates the benefit of aggregating data across healthcare institutions for patients with fragmented care.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Health services research; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ANK is a strategic advisor for Datavant. TLW receives research support from Gilead Sciences. RR-G has been a consultant to Exagen Diagnostics, ThermoFisher, Ampel Solutions, Calabetta Bio and Biogen (all less than $10 000) and none relevant to the current research project.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort identification and partitioning. Algorithms designed to detect attributes from the 1997 ACR, 2012 SLICC, 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria sets were implemented at all CAPriCORN sites containing a validated PCORnet common data model datamart at the time of data capture. Any patient for which the algorithms identified one or more positive attributes from the three criteria sets was included for subsequent partitioning based on the number of SLE encounters identified during the study period. ACR, American College of Rheumatology; CAPriCORN, Chicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network; CDRN, Clinical Data Research Network; EULAR, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology; PCORnet, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Network; SLICC, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics.

Similar articles

References

    1. Murphy G, Lisnevskaia L, Isenberg D. Systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases: challenges to treatment. The Lancet 2013;382:809–18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60889-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fava A, Petri M. Systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and clinical management. J Autoimmun 2019;96:1–13. 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.11.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruce IN, O’Keeffe AG, Farewell V, et al. . Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the systemic lupus International collaborating clinics (SLICC) inception cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1706–13. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205171 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, et al. . Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:891–7. 10.1002/acr.22583 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. . The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271–7. 10.1002/art.1780251101 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types