Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2300077.
doi: 10.1002/bimj.202300077. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

Multiple testing of composite null hypotheses for discrete data using randomized p-values

Affiliations

Multiple testing of composite null hypotheses for discrete data using randomized p-values

Daniel Ochieng et al. Biom J. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

P-values that are derived from continuously distributed test statistics are typically uniformly distributed on (0,1) under least favorable parameter configurations (LFCs) in the null hypothesis. Conservativeness of a p-value P (meaning that P is under the null hypothesis stochastically larger than uniform on (0,1)) can occur if the test statistic from which P is derived is discrete, or if the true parameter value under the null is not an LFC. To deal with both of these sources of conservativeness, we present two approaches utilizing randomized p-values. We illustrate their effectiveness for testing a composite null hypothesis under a binomial model. We also give an example of how the proposed p-values can be used to test a composite null in group testing designs. We find that the proposed randomized p-values are less conservative compared to nonrandomized p-values under the null hypothesis, but that they are stochastically not smaller under the alternative. The problem of establishing the validity of randomized p-values has received attention in previous literature. We show that our proposed randomized p-values are valid under various discrete statistical models, which are such that the distribution of the corresponding test statistic belongs to an exponential family. The behavior of the power function for the tests based on the proposed randomized p-values as a function of the sample size is also investigated. Simulations and a real data example are used to compare the different considered p-values.

Keywords: conservative tests; discretely distributed test statistics; group testing; multiple comparisons; randomized tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chen, X., Doerge, R. W., & Heyse, J. F. (2018). Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures. Biometrical Journal, 60(4), 761-779.
    1. Dai, X., Lin, N., Li, D., & Wang, T. (2019). A non-randomized procedure for large-scale heterogeneous multiple discrete testing based on randomized tests. Biometrics, 75(2), 638-649.
    1. DasGupta, A. (2011). Probability for statistics and machine learning: Fundamentals and advanced topics. Springer.
    1. Decrouez, G., & Hall, P. (2014). Split sample methods for constructing confidence intervals for binomial and Poisson parameters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 76(5), 949-975.
    1. Dickhaus, T. (2013). Randomized p-values for multiple testing of composite null hypotheses. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 143(11), 1968-1979.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources