Kinematic metrics and surgeon experience in robotic cholecystectomies: a pilot study on breaking down technical performance
- PMID: 37857922
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10481-4
Kinematic metrics and surgeon experience in robotic cholecystectomies: a pilot study on breaking down technical performance
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have correlated surgical skill measured by video-based assessment with improved clinical outcomes. Certain automated measures of operative performance in robotic surgery can be gathered beyond video review called objective performance indicators (OPIs). We explore the relationship between OPIs, surgeon experience, and postoperative recovery, hypothesizing that more efficient dissection will be associated with experience.
Methods: Fifty-six robotic cholecystectomies between February 2022 and March 2023 were recorded at a large tertiary referral center. Surgeon experience and clinical outcomes data from the EMR were obtained for all 56 cases with 10 completing the QOL survey. Two steps of robotic cholecystectomies were reviewed: dissection of Calot's triangle (DCT) and dissection of the gallbladder from the liver (DGL). Postoperative recovery was measured using the SF-36 well-being survey. Univariate analysis was conducted using Pearson's coefficient.
Results: Increased operative experience was associated with more efficient camera and instrument movements. DCT had 7 and DGL had 31 of 41 OPIs that correlated with experience. With respect to DGL, more experienced surgeons had reduced step duration and instrument path length and increased camera and instrument speeds.
Conclusions: Several OPIs correlate with surgical experience and may form the basis of more instructive feedback for trainees and less experienced surgeons in improving intraoperative technique.
Keywords: Cholecystectomy; Objective performance indicators; Robotic surgical experience.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee J, Birkmeyer NJO (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. New Engl J Med 369(15):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1300625 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pernar LIM, Robertson FC, Tavakkoli A, Sheu EG, Brooks DC, Smink DS (2017) An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc 31(11):4583–4596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5520-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Curtis NJ, Foster JD, Miskovic D, Brown CSB, Hewett PJ, Abbott S, Hanna GB, Stevenson ARL, Francis NK (2020) Association of surgical skill assessment with clinical outcomes in cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 155(7):590–598. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brajcich BC, Stulberg JJ, Palis BE, Chung JW, Huang R, Nelson H, Bilimoria KY (2021) Association between surgical technical skill and long-term survival for colon cancer. JAMA Oncol 7(1):127–129. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5462 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stulberg JJ, Huang R, Kreutzer L, Ban K, Champagne BJ, Steele SR, Johnson JK, Holl JL, Greenberg CC, Bilimoria KY (2020) Association between surgeon technical skills and patient outcomes. JAMA Surg 155(10):960–968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
