Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 19;13(1):106.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01206-w.

Incidence of asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care unit patients: a prospective cohort study

Chiara Abbruzzese #  1 , Amedeo Guzzardella #  2 , Dario Consonni  3 , Gloria Turconi  4 , Claudia Bonetti  4 , Matteo Brioni  1 , Mauro Panigada  1 , Giacomo Grasselli  1   4
Affiliations

Incidence of asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care unit patients: a prospective cohort study

Chiara Abbruzzese et al. Ann Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Background: Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) incidence, rate, and risk factors vary in literature due to differences in populations, catheters, diagnostic methods, and statistical approaches. The aim of this single-center, prospective, observational study was to assess incidence, incidence rate (IR), cumulative incidence, and risk factors by means of IR ratio (IRR) of asymptomatic CRT in a non-oncologic Intensive Care Unit (ICU) population. CRT development was assessed daily by means of ultrasound screening. The proportions of patients and catheters developing CRT and CRT incidence rates, expressed as the number of events per catheter-days (cd), were calculated. Kalbfleisch and Prentice's method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of CRTs. Univariate and multivariable Poisson regression models were fitted to calculate IRR in risk factors analysis.

Results: Fifty (25%, 95% CI 19-31) out of 203 included patients, and 52 (14%, 95% CI 11-18) out of 375 catheters inserted developed CRT [IR 17.7 (13.5-23.2) CRTs/1000*cd], after 5 [3-10] days from insertion. Forty-six CRTs (88%) were partial thrombosis. All CRTs remained asymptomatic. Obesity and ECMO support were patient-related protective factors [IRR 0.24 (0.10-0.60), p = 0.002 and 0.05 (0.01-0.50), p = 0.011, respectively]. The internal jugular vein had higher CRT IR than other sites [20.1 vs. 5.9 CRTs/1000*cd, IRR 4.22 (1.22-14.63), p = 0.023]. Pulmonary artery catheter and left-side cannulation were catheter-related risk factors [IRR 4.24 (2.00-9.00), p < 0.001 vs. central venous catheters; IRR 2.69 (1.45-4.98), p = 0.002 vs. right cannulation, respectively]. No statistically significant effect of the number of simultaneously inserted catheters [IRR 1.11 (0.64-1.94), p = 0.708] and of the catheterization length [IRR 1.09 (0.97-1.22), p = 0.155] was detected. The ICU length of stay was longer in CRT patients (20 [15-31] vs. 6 [4-14] days, p < 0.001), while no difference in mortality was observed.

Conclusions: CRTs are frequent but rarely symptomatic. This study suggests that obesity and ECMO are protective factors, while pulmonary artery catheter, internal jugular vein and left-side positioning are risk factors for CRT.

Keywords: Asymptomatic; Catheter; Catheter-related thrombosis; Incidence rate; Risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GG received funding from Fischer&Paykel, MSD, Pfizer, and received fees from Getinge, Draeger Medical, Cook, MundiPharma, Fischer and Paykel, Pfizer. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative incidence of catheter-related thrombosis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lance. 2013;382(9889):311–325. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60592-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaffray J, Baumann Kreuziger L, Branchford B, Wee CP, Faustino EVS, Zakai NA, et al. Symptomatic pulmonary embolus after catheter removal in children with catheter related thrombosis: a report from the CHAT Consortium. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20(1):133–137. doi: 10.1111/jth.15548. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Rooden CJ, Schippers EF, Barge RMY, Rosendaal FR, Guiot HFL, van der Meer FJM, et al. Infectious complications of central venous catheters increase the risk of catheter-related thrombosis in hematology patients: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2655–2660. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, Martin JB, Misset B, Renaud B, et al. Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients: Incidence, risks factors, and relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest. 1998;114(1):207–213. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.207. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geerts W. Central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Hematol (United States) 2014;2014(1):306–311. - PubMed