Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 19;18(1):172.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02354-w.

Lymphocyte recovery from radiation-induced lymphopenia in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: correlations with prognosis and lymphocyte-related organs

Affiliations

Lymphocyte recovery from radiation-induced lymphopenia in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: correlations with prognosis and lymphocyte-related organs

Ihsuan Tseng et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Limited studies explored the relationship between lymphocyte recovery after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: ESCC patients with obtainable absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) at 6 months after dCCRT were screened from prospective trials. Patients were divided into groups according to the grade of ALC nadir during radiotherapy (G4 or G1-3) and lymphocyte recovery status, which was assessed by lymphocyte recovery index (LRI), calculated as the ratio of post- to pre-treatment lymphocyte counts. Cox analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymphocyte recovery status. Irradiated relative volumes of the bone marrow (BM) and spleen and effective dose to immune cells (EDIC) were collected to identify their impacts on lymphocyte recovery status by logistic analysis.

Results: 232 patients were enrolled. In 69 patients with G4 ALC nadir (group A and B) and 163 patients with G1-3 ALC nadir (group C and D) during dCCRT, 27 (group A) and 67 (group C) patients showed an insufficient level of lymphocyte recovery (LRI < 60%), and 42 (group B) and 96 (group D) patients showed a satisfactory level of lymphocyte recovery (LRI ≥ 60%). Cox multivariable analysis revealed that inadequate lymphocyte recovery was significantly associated with worse overall survival (HR, 2.80 and 1.70) and local recurrence-free survival (HR, 2.82 and 1.60) both in group A vs group B and group C vs group D. Logistic analysis identified BM V5 (OR 4.24 and 2.29) as an independent predictor of inadequate lymphocyte recovery from G4 or G1-3 ALC nadir, respectively.

Conclusions: Insufficient lymphocyte recovery might serve as a valuable prognostic factor, regardless of whether patients experienced G4 or G1-3 ALC nadir during radiotherapy. Additionally, it was observed that a larger relative volume of BM receiving ≥ 5 Gy was correlated with a higher risk of insufficient lymphocyte recovery.

Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy; Esophageal cancer; Lymphocyte; Recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The dynamic changes of ALCs from baseline (before dCCRT) through week 1–7 during dCCRT and 6 months after the end of dCCRT represented by Tukey box-and-whisker plots. The red dashed line represented the lower limit of normal lymphocyte counts (1.1 × 109/L). ALC absolute lymphocyte count, dCCRT definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan Meier curves of A overall survival, B progression-free survival; C local recurrence-free survival, and D distant metastasis-free survival between 4 groups. Group A (G4 → unrecovered) included patients with G4 ALC nadir during dCCRT and LRI < 60% (N = 26), group B (G4 → recovered) with G4 ALC nadir during dCCRT and LRI ≥ 60% (N = 42). For patients with G1–3 ALC nadir during dCCRT, group C (G1–3 → unrecovered) included those with LRI < 60% (N = 67), while group D (G1–3 → recovered) with LRI ≥ 60% (N = 96). ALC, absolute lymphocyte count dCCRT, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy; DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival; LRFS, local recurrence-free survival; LRI, lymphocyte recovery index; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival

References

    1. Weichselbaum RR, Liang H, Deng L, et al. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a beneficial liaison? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(6):365–379. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.211. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grassberger C, Ellsworth SG, Wilks MQ, et al. Assessing the interactions between radiotherapy and antitumour immunity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(12):729–745. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0238-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marciscano AE, Ghasemzadeh A, Nirschl TR, et al. Elective nodal irradiation attenuates the combinatorial efficacy of stereotactic radiation therapy and immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(20):5058–5071. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3427. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yovino S, Grossman SA. Severity, etiology and possible consequences of treatment-related lymphopenia in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas. CNS Oncol. 2012;1(2):149–154. doi: 10.2217/cns.12.14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heier HE, Christensen I, Froland SS, et al. Early and late effects of irradiation for seminoma testis on the number of blood lymphocytes and their B and T subpopulations. Lymphology. 1975;8(3):69. - PubMed