Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;38(1):43-53.
doi: 10.1111/ppe.13012. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

Type of infertility and prevalence of congenital malformations

Olga Basso  1   2   3 , Gabriel D Shapiro  2   3 , Robert Gagnon  1   2 , Robyn Tamblyn  3   4 , Robert W Platt  2   3   5
Affiliations

Type of infertility and prevalence of congenital malformations

Olga Basso et al. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Children conceived with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) or after a long waiting time have a higher prevalence of congenital malformations, but few studies have examined the contribution of type of infertility.

Objectives: To quantify the association between causes of infertility and prevalence of malformations.

Methods: We compared the prevalence at birth of all and severe malformations diagnosed up to age 2 between 6656 children born in 1996-2017 to parents who had previously been assessed for infertility a an academic fertility clinic ("exposed") and 10,382 children born in the same period to parents with no recent medical history of infertility ("reference"). We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and prevalence differences (PD), by infertility status, type of treatment (non-ART, ART), and infertility diagnosis, in all children and among singletons.

Results: Compared with children of parents with no infertility, children of parents with infertility had a higher prevalence of malformations (both definitions), particularly following ART conceptions. After accounting for treatment, ovulatory disorders were associated with a higher prevalence of both all (PR 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15, 1.93; PD 3.8, 95% CI 1.0, 6.6) and severe (PR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02, 2.29; PD 1.8, 95% CI -0.2, 3.7) malformations (the estimates refer to exposed children conceived without treatment). Unexplained and male factor infertility were associated with all and severe malformations, respectively. Estimates among singletons were similar. A diagnosis of ovulatory disorders was associated with all malformations also in analyses restricted to exposed children, regardless of treatment (we did not examine severe malformations, due to limited power).

Conclusions: In this study, ovulatory disorders were consistently associated with a higher prevalence of congenital malformations (including severe malformations) among live births, regardless of mode of conception.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies; causes of infertility; congenital malformations; fertility treatment; infertility; ovulatory disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hoorsan H, Mirmiran P, Chaichian S, Moradi Y, Hoorsan R, Jesmi F. Congenital malformations in infants of mothers undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50:347-360.
    1. Qin J, Sheng X, Wang H, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of congenital malformations: a meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:777-798.
    1. Zhang Z, Liu X, Wei C, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of congenital urogenital tract malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17:9-20.
    1. Giorgione V, Parazzini F, Fesslova V, et al. Congenital heart defects in IVF/ICSI pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:33-42.
    1. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:330-353.