Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 18;10(2):20551029231206764.
doi: 10.1177/20551029231206764. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.

Loneliness and happiness in the face of the COVID-19 lockdown: Examining the pathways through somatic symptoms and psychological distress

Affiliations

Loneliness and happiness in the face of the COVID-19 lockdown: Examining the pathways through somatic symptoms and psychological distress

Babatola Dominic Olawa et al. Health Psychol Open. .

Abstract

Studies show that loneliness was higher during the pandemic than in the pre-pandemic periods, with negative consequences on individual happiness. This study extends current knowledge by investigating the indirect effects of somatic symptoms and psychological distress in the loneliness-happiness relationship during the COVID-19 lockdown. The cross-sectional sample comprises 538 Nigerian adults (Meanage = 36.48 ± 12.03) with 43% females. Data were collected using structured self-report instruments and subjected to path analyses in SPSS AMOS. Results showed that loneliness and happiness were negatively related. Loneliness and happiness were indirectly related through the successive association between somatic symptoms and psychological distress. Specifically, greater loneliness was associated with increased somatic symptoms, which in turn were associated with greater psychological distress and reduced happiness levels. Clinicians can manage the decline in happiness from loneliness during the pandemic lockdown by administering treatments that mitigate somatic symptoms and psychological distress in concerned clients.

Keywords: COVID-19 lockdown; Loneliness; happiness; psychological distress; somatic symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Parallel model. Note: the indirect effect through psychological distress is shown in broken lines, while the indirect effect through somatic symptoms are indicated in unbroken lines.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Serial model A. Note: the indirect effect through the successive paths from psychological distress to somatic symptoms are indicated in broken lines.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Serial model B. Note: the indirect effect through the successive paths from somatic symptoms to psychological distress are indicated in broken lines.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Parallel and serial indirect effects by psychological distress and somatic symptoms. Note: Beta weights in parenthesis indicate the only changes in estimates for the serial inidre from psychological distress to somatic symptoms. Beta weights for demographic variables were not included in the model for better clarity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdel-Khalek AM. (2006) Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 34(2): 139–150. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139 - DOI
    1. Ajimotokan O, Ezigbo O. (2021) FG extends COVID-19 Lockdown Measures by Four Weeks – Thiss\aylive. Lagos, Nigeria: Thisdaylive. Available at: https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2021/01/26/fg-extends-covid-19-loc... May 30 2023).
    1. Akdoğan R, Çimşir E. (2019) Linking inferiority feelings to subjective happiness: self-concealment and loneliness as serial mediators. Personality and Individual Differences 149: 14–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.028 - DOI
    1. Alemanno A. (2020) The European response to COVID-19: From regulatory emulation to regulatory coordination? European Journal of Risk Regulation 11(2): 307–316. DOI: 10.1017/err.2020.44 - DOI
    1. Arthaud-day ML, Rode JC, Mooney CH, et al. (2005) The subjective wellbeing construct: a test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research 74(3): 445–476. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-004-8209-6 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources