Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 6;4(10):e233549.
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3549.

Removal of Medicaid Prior Authorization Requirements and Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

Affiliations

Removal of Medicaid Prior Authorization Requirements and Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

Paul J Christine et al. JAMA Health Forum. .

Abstract

Importance: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. Despite its effectiveness, buprenorphine uptake has been limited relative to the burden of OUD. Prior authorization (PA) policies may present a barrier to treatment, though research is limited, particularly in Medicaid populations.

Objective: To assess whether removal of Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine to treat OUD is associated with changes in buprenorphine prescriptions for Medicaid enrollees.

Design, setting, and participants: This state-level, serial cross-sectional study used quarterly data from 2015 through the first quarter (January-March) of 2019 to compare buprenorphine prescriptions in states that did and did not remove Medicaid PAs. Analyses were conducted between June 10, 2021, and August 15, 2023. The study included 23 states with active Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine in 2015 that required similar PA policies in fee-for-service and managed care plans and had at least 2 quarters of pre- and postperiod buprenorphine prescribing data.

Exposures: Removal of Medicaid PA for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine for OUD.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was number of quarterly buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees.

Results: Between 2015 and the first quarter of 2019, 6 states in the sample removed Medicaid PAs for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine and had at least 2 quarters of pre- and postpolicy change data. Seventeen states maintained buprenorphine PAs throughout the study period. At baseline, relative to states that repealed PAs, states that maintained PAs had lower buprenorphine prescribing per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (median, 6.6 [IQR, 2.6-13.9] vs 24.1 [IQR, 8.7-27.5] prescriptions) and lower Medicaid managed care penetration (median, 38.5% [IQR, 0.0%-74.1%] vs 79.5% [IQR, 78.1%-83.5%] of enrollees) but similar opioid overdose rates and X-waivered buprenorphine clinicians per 100 000 population. In fully adjusted difference-in-differences models, removal of Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine was not associated with buprenorphine prescribing (1.4% decrease; 95% CI, -31.2% to 41.4%). For states with below-median baseline buprenorphine prescribing, PA removal was associated with increased buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (40.1%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 95.1%), while states with above-median prescribing showed no change (-20.7%; 95% CI, -41.0% to 6.6%).

Conclusions and relevance: In this serial cross-sectional study of Medicaid PA policies for buprenorphine for OUD, removal of PAs was not associated with overall changes in buprenorphine prescribing among Medicaid enrollees. Given the ongoing burden of opioid overdoses, continued multipronged efforts are needed to remove barriers to buprenorphine care and increase availability of this lifesaving treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lin reported receiving personal fees from the National Committee for Quality Assurance via a grant from Alkermes outside the submitted work. Dr Tipirneni reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, and The Commonwealth Fund outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Map of Medicaid Prior Authorization (PA) Status for Buprenorphine as of January 2021
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Estimated Change in Buprenorphine Prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid Enrollees Comparing States that Removed Prior Authorization (PA) vs Those That Maintained PAs, 2015-2019
Percent change estimates come from an event study model that controls for state fixed effects, year fixed effects, and the state-level covariates listed in the Statistical Analysis section. The SEs are clustered at the state level. Using a 2-way fixed-effects difference-in-differences model adjusted for all of the state-level covariates, PA removal was not associated with significant changes in buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (−1.4% increase; 95% CI, −31.2% to 41.4%). Solid line indicates percent change; shaded area, 95% CI; dotted line, repeal of PAs for buprenorphine.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Estimated Change in Buprenorphine Prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid Enrollees Associated With Removal of Prior Authorizations (PAs) Overall and by Categories of Baseline State Characteristics, 2015-2019
The overall model represents a difference-in-differences estimate of percent change in buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees, comparing states that removed PAs vs those that maintained PAs. Models evaluating heterogeneity by baseline prescribing, Medicaid managed care penetration, and Medicaid expansion status used a difference-in-difference-in-differences design. Models controlled for state fixed effects, year fixed effects, and the state-level covariates listed in the Statistical Analysis section. The SEs are clustered at the state level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, et al. . Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2017;357:j1550. doi:10.1136/bmj.j1550 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones CW, Christman Z, Smith CM, et al. . Comparison between buprenorphine provider availability and opioid deaths among US counties. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;93:19-25. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Priest KC, Gertner AK. State officials shouldn’t wait for federal action to increase opioid addiction treatment access. Health Affairs Blog, May 21, 2019. Accessed January 20, 2022. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/state-officials-shouldn-...
    1. Beetham T. Buprenorphine prior authorization removal: low hanging fruit in the opioid overdose crisis. Harv Public Health Rev (Camb). 2019;25. doi:10.54111/0001/Y2 - DOI
    1. Andrews CM, Abraham AJ, Grogan CM, Westlake MA, Pollack HA, Friedmann PD. Impact of Medicaid restrictions on availability of buprenorphine in addiction treatment programs. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(3):434-436. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304856 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types