Labor Neuraxial Analgesia and Its Association With Perinatal Outcomes in China in 2015-2016: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
- PMID: 37862597
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006435
Labor Neuraxial Analgesia and Its Association With Perinatal Outcomes in China in 2015-2016: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Abstract
Background: The use of labor neuraxial analgesia (NA) in China has increased significantly in the past decade, and the current rate of use is unknown. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of NA based on a large multicenter cross-sectional survey, the China Labor and Delivery Survey (CLDS) (2015-2016), and to evaluate the association between NA and intrapartum caesarean delivery (CD) and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Methods: The CLDS was a facility-based cross-sectional investigation with a cluster random sampling scheme conducted from 2015 to 2016. A specific weight was assigned to each individual based on the sampling frame. Logistic regression was adopted to analyze the factors associated with the use of NA. A propensity score matching scheme was used to analyze the associations between NA and intrapartum CD and perinatal outcomes.
Results: A total of 51,488 vaginal deliveries or intrapartum CD were included in our study, excluding prelabor CDs. The weighted NA rate was 17.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6-18.0) in this survey population. Nulliparous, previous CD, hypertensive disorders, and labor augmentation were associated with higher use of NA. In the propensity score-matched analysis, NA was associated with reduced risks of intrapartum CD, especially intrapartum CD by maternal request (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78 and aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76, respectively), 3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89), and 5-minute Apgar score ≤3 (aOR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.66).
Conclusions: The use of NA may be associated with improved obstetric outcomes, including fewer intrapartum CD, less birth canal trauma, and better neonatal outcomes in China.
Copyright © 2023 International Anesthesia Research Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Intrapartum epidural analgesia and low Apgar score among singleton infants born at term: A propensity score matched study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Sep;99(9):1155-1162. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13837. Epub 2020 Mar 20. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 32142154 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between neonatal outcomes of labor and delivery with labor neuraxial analgesia and without analgesia: A propensity score-matched study.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023 Apr;49(4):1144-1153. doi: 10.1111/jog.15571. Epub 2023 Feb 2. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023. PMID: 36734027
-
Association of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia with Maternal Blood Transfusion.Anesthesiology. 2023 Dec 1;139(6):734-745. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004743. Anesthesiology. 2023. PMID: 37585507 Free PMC article.
-
Delivery mode and maternal and neonatal outcomes of combined spinal-epidural analgesia compared with no analgesia in spontaneous labor: A single-center observational study in Japan.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Mar;46(3):425-433. doi: 10.1111/jog.14194. Epub 2020 Jan 20. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020. PMID: 31960539
-
Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13162. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37171818 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A randomized sequential allocation study on the optimum programmed intermittent epidural boluses interval time with different concentrations of ropivacaine combined with the dural puncture epidural technique for labor analgesia.Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1508514. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1508514. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39840086 Free PMC article.
-
Association of epidural labor analgesia with maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: a propensity score-matched single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07155-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39856582 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing the use of epidural labor analgesia: a cross-sectional survey analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 7;10:1280342. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1280342. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38384316 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1503–1510.
-
- Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012:Cd009234.
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209: obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e208–e225.
-
- Butwick AJ, Bentley J, Wong CA, Snowden JM, Sun E, Guo N. United States state-level variation in the use of neuraxial analgesia during labor for pregnant women. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e186567.
-
- Health and Social Care Information Centre: NHS Maternity Statistics, England, 2010–2011. Accessed November 5, 2021. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/pubs/maternity1011 .
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous