Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;24(1):e13883.
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13883. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

Conservation in a litre of air

Affiliations

Conservation in a litre of air

David M Lodge. Mol Ecol Resour. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Since Ficetola et al. (2008) alerted ecologists and conservation biologists to the existence of environmental DNA (eDNA), the number of studies using eDNA has exploded, with a rapidly increasing diversity of research, monitoring, and management objectives. Initial applications focused on amphibians and fishes while today's taxonomic targets span the phylogenetic tree. The environmental media that are sampled have expanded from freshwater to saltwater to soils, and, most recently, to air. In this issue of Molecular Ecology Resources, Lynggaard et al. (Molecular Ecology Resources, 2023) use eDNA captured on air filters to census vertebrate biodiversity in a forest. With a three day, six sample period, 143 sample effort in a nature park in a rural area of Zealand, Denmark, their wild species detections comprised about 25% of the terrestrial vertebrates that are known to occur in the area, including about 33% of the mammal, 17% of the bird, and 60% of the amphibian species. This study demonstrates that air sampling for eDNA has the potential to become a powerful standard method for terrestrial biodiversity assessment that is complementary to traditional methods (e.g., trapping, visual and acoustic observation, collection of scat and hair).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Andres, K., Lodge, D. M., Sethi, S. A., & Andres, J. (2023). Environmental DNA reveals genetic diversity and population structure of an invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 120, e2307345120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307345120
    1. Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2008). Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters, 4, 423-425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118
    1. Kelly, R. P., Lodge, D. M., & Lee, K. N. (2023). Toward a national eDNA strategy for the United States. Environmental DNA, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.432
    1. Littlefair, J. E., Allerton, J. J., Brown, A. S., Butterfield, D. M., Robins, C., Economou, C. K., Garrett, N. R., & Clare, E. L. (2023). Air-quality networks collect environmental DNA with the potential to measure biodiversity at continental scales. Current Biology, 33, PR426-R428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.036
    1. Lodge, D. M., Turner, C. R., Jerde, C. L., Barnes, M. A., Chadderton, L., Egan, S. P., Feder, J. L., Mahon, A. R., & Pfrender, M. E. (2012). Conservation in a cup of water: Estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2555-2558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x

Substances

LinkOut - more resources