The immunological landscape in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and overcoming resistance to immunotherapy
- PMID: 37866368
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00207-8
The immunological landscape in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and overcoming resistance to immunotherapy
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis and there are few treatment options. The development of immunotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has been difficult, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are only effective in a very small subset of patients. Most obstacles for treatment have been related to intertumoural and intratumoural heterogeneity, the composition of tumour stroma, and crosstalk with cancer cells. Improved molecular characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a better understanding of its microenvironment have paved the way for novel immunotherapy strategies, including the identification of predictive biomarkers, the development of rational combinations to optimise effectiveness, and the targeting of new mechanisms. Future immunotherapy strategies should consider individual characteristics to move beyond the traditional immune targets and circumvent the resistance to therapies that have been developed so far.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests VC-R received grants from the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network and the Francois Wallace Monahan Fund in loving memory of Michael Insel. JC received grants or contracts from the Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation, Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Neuroendocrines, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, Institut National du Cancer, and Fondation ARC. PH received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Halozyme, Ipsen, Fibrogen, Merck, Rafael, Servier, Thaio, Vect-Horus, and Viatris; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Halozyme, Merck, Sanofi, Servier, and Viatris; and support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Halozyme, Erythec, Merck, and Servier. CN received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Fresenius Kabi, Incyte Biosciences, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, Nutricia, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Viatris; grants from OSE Immunotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Fresenius Kabi, and Nutricia; and support for attending meetings or travel from Merck, MSD, Mylan, Viatris, OSE Immunotherapeutics, and Pierre Fabre. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical