The effectiveness of fracture liaison services in patients with hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 37867909
- PMCID: PMC10585289
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20838
The effectiveness of fracture liaison services in patients with hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: In recent years, fracture liaison services (FLS) have been applied for hip fractures; however, their effectiveness remains uncertain.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of FLS in patients with hip fractures.
Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Data sources: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ebsco, Ovid, Web of Science, Medline, CNKI, Wangfang, and Vip were searched from their date of inception to March 2023. Two researchers screened the literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality, extracted data, and conducted a meta-analysis using ReviewManager 5.4.
Results: After screening, 12 randomised controlled trials (RCT) including 2136 patients were used in the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were hip function rate of recurrent fracture, medication adherence, and degree of weakness. FLS improved hip function in patients with hip fractures [MD = 9.37, 95 % CI (7.69, 11.06), P < 0.0001], P < 0.0001], medication adherence [OR = 10.59, 95 % CI (1.64, 68.41), P<0.0001], degree of weakness [MD = -1.45, 95%CI (-1.68,-1.23), P<0.0001], and reduced the rate of recurrent fractures [OR = 0.60, 95 % CI (0.44, 0.82).
Conclusion: Implementation of the FLS management model was beneficial for patients with hip fractures. It can positively impact the prognosis of patients with hip fractures by improving hip function, reducing the rate of recurrent fractures, and improving medication adherence and degree of weakness.
Keywords: Fracture liaison service; Hip fracture; Meta-analysis.
© 2023 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Zoe L,Brett G.Hiba K.Hip fracture[EB/OL][2020-02-17] [2022-03-16]. https:/bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/zh-cn/3000105.
-
- Veroneses N., Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture[J] Injury. 2018;49(8):1458–1460. - PubMed
-
- Mclellan A., GallacherS, Fraser M., et al. The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and managementof patients with osteoporotic fracture[J] Osteoporos. Int. 2003;14(12):1028–1034. - PubMed
-
- Cosman F., Nicpon K., Nieves J. Results of a fracture liaison service on hip fracture patients in an open healthcare system [J] Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017;29(2):331–334. - PubMed
-
- Li Xingguo, Deng Yelong, Liu Zhaohui. The epidemiology of hip fracture of the elderly in China [J] Journal of Practical orthopaedics. 2021;27(7):601–606.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
